- Awards
- 27
Not necessarily as a topic (like they did with Trump) but included in everyday situations in order to appear as realistic as possible.
Hm?
Hm?
if a show is meant to be realistic and be set in the now, it couldn't plausibly avoid the pandemic.
I feel I should agree with you but I also wonder how these stories/episodes are going to age. Let's be optimistic for a moment and pretend that the virus is completely under control in, say, 2025. How's that going to affect the re-watchability of those stories?Unfortunately it’s a part of our lives that’s not going away anytime soon
How's that going to affect the re-watchability of those stories?
But that didn't change the look of DALLAS. Like the death of JFK doesn't change the look of 60s period drama.Should DALLAS not have made references to the oil shortages in the late 70s?
...it also shouldn't look as "that story that ignored the pandemic".they'll simply know that it was filmed and took place during the great pandemic of the early 2020s.
I think it's also worth remembering that at least stuff filmed early on in the pandemic got affected anyway - certain actors of age being written out, social distancing, skipping party scenes etc, so it's noticeable (even if they try) either way. I think it'll be hard in the future to watch shows that are filmed early on in the pandemic and not notice it.I think I get your point; show's that make contemporary references can feel dated on rewatch. But the pandemic isn't some minor pop culture or political bit of minutia that will be forgotten in 10 years. When people watch the show in the future, they'll simply know that it was filmed and took place during the great pandemic of the early 2020s.
Should DALLAS not have made references to the oil shortages in the late 70s?
And they can do so much more with these fictional presidents and prime ministers. Murder, conspiracy, adultery, outrageous secrets and all that juicy stuff.I don't mind series creating their own politicians
It's hard to realistically reflect what's going on with the pandemic as what's going on keeps changing (or at least it did). After EastEnders returned from lockdown, it did this weird thing where the pandemic had existed, but now was sort of over which meant the characters were able to travel even though the viewers couldn't, while the actors playing the characters couldn't stand anywhere near each other even if they were supposed to be living in the same house or sleeping in the same bed, even though the viewers could. I'm really looking forward to re-watching those episodes to see if it makes any sense from a future perspective.Not necessarily as a topic (like they did with Trump) but included in everyday situations in order to appear as realistic as possible.
It's not fiction, but I'm listening to year-old podcast episodes of Election Profit Makers, which is all about living through the last American election during lockdown. It was originally made and released as those events was happening, but hearing it now as an un intentional piece of recent history is just fascinating.I feel I should agree with you but I also wonder how these stories/episodes are going to age. Let's be optimistic for a moment and pretend that the virus is completely under control in, say, 2025. How's that going to affect the re-watchability of those stories?
"The OLM’s not gonna sanction a production boost now. It’s not 1978, you know." I love all those little references, even more so now than at the time.Should DALLAS not have made references to the oil shortages in the late 70s?
One of the very few things I liked about New DYNASTY is in the opening episode where Fallon makes reference to Blake voting for Trump even though she can't bear to say his name. And I really liked the bit in the second episode of EMPIRE where a drunken Hakeem is caught on video urinating in the middle of a restaurant while declaring, “All you white people that voted for the first Black president to make you feel good about not being racist — the joke’s on y’all cos Barack Obama ain’t nothing but a sellout!” followed by a scene of his father grovelling to the White House over the phone (“Mr President, I am so, so sorry … We all love you … Come on Barack, you know you don’t have to use that kind of language with me!”) before the line goes dead. Conversely, I liked how sealed off from the rest of the world DALLAS mostly was -- no Christmas, just barbecues.Trump, Johnson, Merkel, Biden etc don't need to exist in fictional series.
I'm not sure I would enjoy it more with context.so without that context it looked unrealistic that they were so far from each other.
That show is so blatantly opinionated. I stopped after season 2 and apparently it's getting even worse after that."The Good Fight" tried to do that this season
What I find weird is in The Connors and This Is Us (for example) they make a point of wearing their masks, but as soon as they get in the door and have to speak their line they whip it off - even with strangers. If anything, they should put it on when entering a shop and take it off outside.From time to time I keep wondering (only for tiny moment) why people don't wear masks e.g. in scenes taking place in a bus, theatre, hospital etc. I guess I got used to that over the past 2 years.
I think he made the right choice not including it and I agree with his reasoning.Ricky Gervais has decided not to do it.
I agree, although I do appreciate how creative some of these shows have had to get during the pandemic. It can’t be an easy task producing a show with everything going on.Therefore my final opinion is: if it can be avoided, avoid it.