Most definitely. It's easy to see why Verna Fields won the Oscar for Best Editing as it's so beautifully put together. Not a second too long or short. If it was any longer or any shorter it just wouldn't feel right.
I second that!!
I was thrilled when they first appeared on home media (I think it was a Jaws VHS that had some bonus material at the end, but I might be misremembering. Perhaps it was the first DVD). It was fascinating to realise how much impact the "new" scenes had on me because I didn't know them at all. I found the scene where Cassidy is looking at Chrissie's remains really tense and stressful, which goes to show how well Jaws continues to work.
I'd be curious to see an extended version of the film with these scenes edited in, but as we've said, the film probably works best without them. I'm glad Jaws is considered definitive as it is and there haven't been numerous different versions. Many years ago, I bought Spielberg's Close Encounters Of The Third Kind on Blu-ray and I think that has three different versions. But I've never got round to watching the extended versions because the film felt so "right" as it was.
I'm also very grateful that the enhancements Steven Spielberg had made to Jaws for HD are incredibly subtle, with stuff that we don't notice, such as colour grading so that the sky matches up from shot to shot,
Actually, when I buy DVD/Blu Ray I really enjoy all the bonus materials! But I guess, when you're a fan, you're interested by all the extra stuff which allows us a better understanding of the film, or about the director vision, why did he did this or that...
That's interesting. I'd wondered if they'd changed it because some language wasn't as acceptable in the 21st Century. But that's just because I can't think why else they would re-dub it.
I really have no idea what line would have been unacceptable. The only line (or, I must say, word) I remember had a (little) change occurs when Martin is with his son who mimics his father. At the end Martin is asking for a kiss. In the 1975 french dubbing they translate that as a "hug", in 2004 they translate with the correct word.
I know we used to have the same "french voice" for big stars so it's pretty frustrating when a star actor is not dubbed as usual. In that case I just tought the 1st dubbing was simply perfect. One exemple: when Robert Shaw is telling us the "USS Indianapolis" story, we're in immersion, focused, with a perfect voice, a deep voice, a "darker" voice who left us totally hooked until the end.
Perhaps when you have your fourth watch of 2021.
SURE!
By the way, In each of my watch I can't do otherwise but pointing out (minor, funny) inconsistencies. I really like to find inconsistencies in movies because I really think it's too hard to always match the initial script because we're watching a film for 2 hours but sometimes it takes weeks between two scenes. For exemple they can shoot an interior scene one day and the next scene (exterior scene for exemple) weeks after that.
Do you do that?? And what are the inconsistencies you can't help but take note?
Mine are about the killing dates, barrels and and and and... the Quint chair!!
What the hell did they do with that chair to make it disappear in a heartbeat?
