She wasn't a qualified, professional writer, she would've allowed the writers to do their job. Most of her co-stars were absolutely disgusted with Wyman, because it was her call to have her own storylines. Her behavior got so bossy, in later years, that it also went down the drain."
This couldn't be farther from the truth.
Jane may have been opinionated and blunt whenever she didn't like a script, but never did anyone working with her tell me that she was incompetent or unqualified. Neither was anyone disgusted with her work ethics. Quite the contrary is the case: She was the consummate professional, which is why her fellow cast members adored her.
Adsressing things that are unsuitable in a script, like misguided character development or incoherent dialog, is nothing other cast members wouldn't have done, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with it because that's what cast readings are for. David and Susan did it all the time, and Foxworth more often than anyone albeit in a different way that drove the writers and producers nuts. Foxworth's criticism always seemed to have been over the top since he apparently didn't understand he wasn't on a Shakespeare stage, but on a TV drama, but he felt TV was somewhat beneath him.
IMDb's anonymous post about Jane gives evidence of the biggest problem of IMDb — it's unreliability because there is no editorial staff to check facts. Everybody can just edit and add stuff. They
claim to check facts, but they apparently don't.
IMDb is very inaccurate. Just one example what happens when you are an expert and try to correct things:
In # 149 <6.22> "Nowhere to Run", Angie has some of her Del Oro staff members make preparations for Vickie and Dan's engagement part at the Mansion. One of them is the regular Del Oro chief receptionist (a silent bit played by extra and stuntwoman Arlena Hollarman Apisa), who wears glasses in this scene. She wants to put a vase away (the Ming vase Chao-Li later drops). Angela calls her Helen, and clearly addresses that Del Oro employee because Angie's line is about the vase. But this is the scene where someone ridiculously got the first name "Helen" from and attributed it to Mrs. Whitaker's (Laurel Schaefer), who is standing next to Angela. Therefore, IMDb lists Laurel Schaefer as "Helen Whitaker", which is totally ridiculous. Mrs. Whitaker's name was never mentioned — neither on screen, nor in the script. I tried to fix it on IMDb and explained what happened, offering proof from production documents since they
claim they want to do fact-checking, but they declined my changes, saying it's from "unreliable sources". What's more reliable than the episode itself and production papers?
I think that example shows that nobody should take IMDb seriously. Also, many rôles are attributed to the wrong talent on IMDb — not a "Falcon" specific problem, but it happens on thousands of productions on IMDb.
