- Awards
- 52
When Jenna Wade stood trial for the death of Naldo Marchetta, she was not convicted of murder, but of voluntary manslaughter, and sentenced to seven years in prison. The logic was questionable. The prosecution itself argued that Jenna shot Naldo to prevent him from raping her, in other words, they acknowledged her motive was self-defence. Normally, that line of reasoning would be grounds for full acquittal, or at worst, a suspended sentence given the mitigating circumstances. Yet her defence attorney, Scotty Demarest, who was supposed to be one of the sharpest lawyers in Dallas, failed to make this point effectively. Instead of preparing his defence to cover every possible outcome and hammering home the principle of self-defence, Scotty seemed to let the prosecution’s framing stand. A more capable lawyer would have ensured her freedom by undermining the prosecution case by putting forward arguments of justifiable self-defence.

