
For about the first 10 years, yes it was the best ever. Would have been even better in my opinion if Steve Forrest stayed as Jock EwingDo you consider Dallas to be the Greatest American soap opera/drama series of all time or is there another show better & more worthy of that title?
I want you're opinions.
Does Dallas deserve to be remembered as the Greatest of all time or are their other shows more worthy?
And if not, why not?
View attachment 38497
Maybe if it is just seasons 1-10DALLAS is regarded as "the most successful" drama series in global TV history, and we mostly all know why.
But, to be frank, the series stumbled so badly in so many ways during the last half of its run -- due in part to Katzman's creative rigidity and the replacing Paulsen with Lakin -- that it's hard to really call it "the greatest of all time."
That's what's so melancholy about the '80s nighttime soaps: so much potential, so effectively realized early on, and their losing their directions and identities so thoroughly. Or, as one friend said in the break-room circa 1988: "those shows drive me up the wall!" and she wasn't being soap-snotty when she said it.
View attachment 38502

DALLAS became so huge so quickly, that it had become a literal legend in its own time within just a couple of years of 'Who Shot JR?'.
There's always a lot of woulda/coulda/shoulda in these topics, and no series is perfect -- especially when it runs some 14 odd seasons. But if only the Donna Reed debacle hadn't happened (which seemed to mark the start of the show's descent) and Bobby's revival had not been explained in a single scene as a dream, and if Katzman had not repeatedly upstaged and eventually replaced David Paulsen with Calvin Clements Jr and the returning Art Lewis and the goofy Howard Lakin (although I'd hate to have missed Season 9 of DYNASTY, which Paulsen helmed)...
Susan Howard observed that the audience was "abused again" over one of DALLAS' avoidable disasters they chose not to avoid, and one does begin to feel that Katzman seemingly developed a contempt for the audience over time -- like a doomed relationship where one partner loves the other and that love is not only not reciprocated, but the unloving partner becomes sneeringly bemused at the power they have over the other who so over-values them.
Over on DYNASTY, the producers merely seemed contemptuous of their own well-cast actors because they knew they needed those actors in order to physically make the show ... the brass there never seemed aware that the audience even existed.
Which is why the Wes Parmalee plotline was the karmic epicentre of all that DALLAS truly was -- ghosts of patriarchs, craziness and blurry visuals, and dreams that weren't dreams yet non-dreams which were dreams, in all its glory: the greatest fabulous mess of all time, at the very least.
View attachment 38564
I wonder why we always find this need for validation on the Dallas forum. Is it based on fear or a moment of panic that another soap could be better, or that an old soap like Dallas has stopped being relevant outside tellytalk world?
Why all this preaching to the choir? What's the psychology behind it?
I regard the time span from "Kristen in the pool" till "Bobby shot" + Who shot JR as the best TV ever written.
it’s a primal call to greatness that no mere Dynasty-watcher could ever hope to understand!I wonder why we always find this need for validation on the Dallas forum. Is it based on fear or a moment of panic that another soap could be better, or that an old soap like Dallas has stopped being relevant outside tellytalk world?
Why all this preaching to the choir? What's the psychology behind it?
it’s a primal call to greatness that no mere Dynasty-watcher could ever hope to understand!