#metoo

[Snarky Oracle!]

We've talked about post-partum and excessive meds for decades. All this is just the usual feministic excuse to justify killing the kids whenever you feel like it -- and even Saint Oprah is on board.

Adam's sin the Garden of Eden wasn't oppressing Eve but his refusal to say "no" to her.

 

[Jimmy Todd]

I saw that Oprah held a sort of group meeting with women about the case and their sympathetic leanings toward Clancy.
If Clancy went on a rant about how their are only two genders and "men should keep out of women's sports," would public support and sympathy for Clancy vanish?

 

[CeeCee72]

If Clancy went on a rant about how their are only two genders and "men should keep out of women's sports," would public support and sympathy for Clancy vanish?

It wouldn't vanish, it would just shift to the other side

 

[Mel O'Drama]

Lindsay Clancy holdout juror says he had no doubt she deliberately killed her children:​

Lindsay Clancy holdout juror had no doubt she deliberately killed her children

It is the first time the juror, who refused to side with the others and acquit Clancy, has spoken publicly about his decision.

www.bbc.co.uk

Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses and what the prosecution presents, I thought it was enough proof that she knew exactly what she was doing and planned it.

As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented.

 

[Frank Underwood]

It wouldn't vanish, it would just shift to the other side

Yes, people are often bizarrely tribal that way. They don't mind supporting a monster, so long as that monster is "one of them."

I've never understood the obsession some people have with identity. I don't care if a person shares most of my values; if they do something heinous, they should pay for it.

 

[Snarky Oracle!]

Lindsay Clancy holdout juror says he had no doubt she deliberately killed her children:​

Lindsay Clancy holdout juror had no doubt she deliberately killed her children

It is the first time the juror, who refused to side with the others and acquit Clancy, has spoken publicly about his decision.

www.bbc.co.uk

It won't load for me. Or I have to buy something.

Yes, people are often bizarrely tribal that way. They don't mind supporting a monster, so long as that monster is "one of them."

I've never understood the obsession some people have with identity. I don't care if a person shares most of my values; if they do something heinous, they should pay for it.

Yes, what no one wants to concede is that Clancy's fans are just bad women supporting bad women because those women are bad.

The "psychosis" issue (debunked in court) and excessive pharmacology topics aren't new in the public discourse. They're just excuses for evil goddesses to elevate an evil goddess to rank of Evil Goddess because they're evil.

I mean, it's not as complicated as we make it out to be. Much like the legal case itself.