Why did you post a pic of Krystle from The Reunion asking Blake to turn the air-con off? Not everything is about DYNASTY.She probably thought it was dumb. But she would have fit in perfectly.
![]()

Why is it getting poorly reviewed in your opinion?I know this thread is for the tv show, but I thought this was the best place to discuss the new movie considering yall are fans of the brand. First I'll say it was one of the best action films I've seen of the year and also the worst marketed film in recent memory. Based on the trailers I expected this to suck. I wasn't enthused about the casting and it didn't look particularly funny, it looked very middle of the road. When I got there I got a straight up action flick with good humor, an easy to follow plot and an EXCELLENT cast. They tried to market it like the Drew/Cameron/Lucy films which were slapstick comedy, but this was more in line with a Mission Impossible with a lighter feel. The action scenes were truly excellent and I loved all the globe trotting location shooting. Why didn't they highlight the action in the trailers?!
Then the cast. My goodness, Elizabeth Banks, Djimon Hounsou and Patrick Stewart were all excellent as their respective Bosley's. I also liked them making Patrick Stewart the Bosley of the original series and 00 movies which allowed the to tie all that together. Jacklyn Smith as one of the new Charlie's was also a nice touch and a great thread to follow for a sequel. The actual angels disappointed me prior to seeing the movie. I HATE Kristen Stewart in everything she does, but she was so fun and relaxed and a true bad ass. She reminded me of a modernized Jill Monroe. The Sabrina of the group was definitely Ella Balinska's character and for a newcomer she carried a lot of the film. She was by far the best in the action scenes, she was smart and also helped emotionally center the film with her relationships with Stewart's character and Djimon's Bosley. The third Angel was a newcomer and felt like a mix of Kris and Julie. She provided lots of comedic elements to the film.
Overall this was a beautifully made film and I hate it didn't do better so we could get a sequel. The other films I felt were dated with the lack of guns and fighting style and it was too slapstick to really evoke the Angels for me. This treated the subject matter with respect while still having fun. They were allowed to be unabashedly sexy, but also bad ass fighters on the same level as men and most importantly they were smart. If this is the last Angels related thing we get I'll be happy. It's just a shame because they set up so many different potential storylines. They have it set up where ANY of the former Angels can return as a Charlie or a Bosley and by showing the different groups of Angels worldwide (this movie probably featured around 20 Angels), they could easily do a spin-off tv series on one of the streaming networks.
Why is it getting poorly reviewed in your opinion?
That was certainly my impression. Simply calling it Charlie's Angels without a subtitle didn't help.People were confused thinking this was a remake instead of a reboot that brought all the projects together
I enjoy Season Four when I watch it. While I'm almost always disappointed that Tiffany Welles (Shelley Hack) wasn't used too much earlier in the year, I genuinely enjoy the episodes she's the central focus of. I think the episode "Angels on Campus" (Season 4, Episode 11) was the first true Tiffany-centric episode. It's the one where she visits her old sorority to investigate the disappearance of some young college-age girls who are being sold into white slavery. There are other good episodes revolving around Tiffany, such as: "Of Ghost and Angels", which concerns Tiffany having psychic insights to her troubled friend's abusive husband; "Home Sweet Homes", when the girls get tied up in real estate; and "Nips and Tucks", which follows a plastic surgeon who gives criminals a new face.I’m continuing my rewatch of the original series, which I’m going to follow up with the 3 movies and the reboot tv series. I just wrapped up season 4 and am two hours into the 3 hour season 5 premiere. Crazy they gave them a 3 hour premiere, but I give them props for going all out for Julie’s introduction. Even more so than when they introduced Kris, they do a good job of fleshing Julie out from the start and considering she isn’t a police officer or detective, she certainly needed that. It is bittersweet since I think the Tiffany/Kris/Kelly grouping was the best after the original trio once they starting writing for Tiffany.
One thing that is immediate that I Miss is the glam of the previous season. Because Tiffany had that classy east coast vibe they ended up stepping the fashion up for all of them. Kris in particular benefited that season because she was no longer the baby of the group and got to finally grow up. This season seems more gritty action based and the style is more trendy and 80s. So far I do like it, but it’s certainly different from the other seasons. I will say I much prefer this to the isolation you’d get in some of those season 4 episodes focused only on one Angel.
I’m sad that I’m almost at the end, but I look forward to rewatching the first two movies which I haven’t seen in probably 10 years, as well as the reboot series which I only saw one or two episodes of.
It's interesting you bring this up. You're absolutely right.@ClassyCo One funny thing, I’ve been watching some documentaries about the show and one main thing is that the producers keep saying what a bad actress they found Shelley Hack even before she aires and blame that for limiting her role and not promoting her. Only problem is, those scripts would’ve been written already so I don’t buy that. Also, she auditioned so they knew what they were getting. She was just fine when she had stuff to do. Contrast that with Tanya Roberts and she can’t act to save her life lol. I think the truth is that Hack was probably the network choice and not the producers choice and they resented that. If acting was your main issue then you wouldn’t have replaced her with Roberts.
Season Five is horrifically bad. Shelley Hack has always said that the reason she was axed is because the producers were perfectly alright with her taking all the blame for Season Four's downturn in popularity, and that by axing her they could bring forth further publicity for Season Five by searching for a new angel. It certainly makes sense. In 1977 and 1979, the two times prior they had searched for a new actress, there was considerable buzz around who would fill the vacant angel seat. It didn't really happen this time around, though. Interest in the show itself had fizzled, although a lot of people did seem eager to see Shari Belafonte, daughter of singer Harry Belafonte, step into the available role. That, of course, was not meant to be.I’m still watching season 5 and I boy is the energy gone. The Hawaii episodes mostly worked for the location, but once they went back to LA it’s just deadly dull. You can’t have Julie in a bikini so she can’t even really utilize her sex appeal. These episodes highlight just what a bad actress Tanya Roberts was. They also keep writing her like a doofus with this high pitches squeal every time she gets caught. It’s rough. Jacklyn Smith and Cheryl Ladd seem bored like they’re going through the motions. If anything I’d say the standout this season has been David Doyle who has had some nice moments so far. He’s also the only one who has chemistry with Tanya Roberts. Still, I’m ready for this to be over so I can watch the reboot tv show. I expect that to be another stinker but I’m still curious about it.
Yes, that last year is horrendous. I seem to keep saying some variation of that opinion over and over again. But it's worth repeating. The fifth and final season of Charlie's Angels is really bad. I think the episode "Mr. Galaxy" is probably the worst of the batch, although those early season Hawaiian episodes are horrible as well. The show was never Shakespeare, but it was at least fun before. Now it's stale. No flavor, no energy. It's boring. The episodes seem endless and the chemistry has been shot in the head and died a cold, lonely death.I just finished season 5 today @ClassyCo and I must say I’m stunned at how each episode was progressively worse than the previous one. I have such vague memories of this season and I now see why I never watched it in full. I had *no* idea the show had gotten so bad.
Tonight I’m going to watch the first two movies and another admission, I never saw Full Throttle! I wasn’t too fond of the new trio. It’s a fun movie, but it was too different for me to truly get behind. I’m curious how I’ll react to them now. I haven’t seen the first movie since it was in theaters however many years ago.
Yes, that last year is horrendous. I seem to keep saying some variation of that opinion over and over again. But it's worth repeating. The fifth and final season of Charlie's Angels is really bad. I think the episode "Mr. Galaxy" is probably the worst of the batch, although those early season Hawaiian episodes are horrible as well. The show was never Shakespeare, but it was at least fun before. Now it's stale. No flavor, no energy. It's boring. The episodes seem endless and the chemistry has been shot in the head and died a cold, lonely death.I just finished season 5 today @ClassyCo and I must say I’m stunned at how each episode was progressively worse than the previous one. I have such vague memories of this season and I now see why I never watched it in full. I had *no* idea the show had gotten so bad.
Tonight I’m going to watch the first two movies and another admission, I never saw Full Throttle! I wasn’t too fond of the new trio. It’s a fun movie, but it was too different for me to truly get behind. I’m curious how I’ll react to them now. I haven’t seen the first movie since it was in theaters however many years ago.