Jock-O-Lantern
Telly Talk Dream Maker
Easy: JR Ewing. Plus, it was the first night time soap. It was something people saw in the daytime, but with a bigger budget, at night.
Easy: JR Ewing. Plus, it was the first night time soap. It was something people saw in the daytime, but with a bigger budget, at night.
Did Patrick return because of viewing figures or because Larry was lonely and missed his playmate?
Did viewers eventually accept no more Bobby and when was his comeback known, mid season or later? Was his departure left long enough to really know if Dallas could go on Bobby-less or did they give in to audience/Larry too soon?
Although PEYTON PLACE was first (1964-1969).
Victoria got the hell out.
Which version of the Doctor Who theme tune? In the 1963-1989 classic series of Doctor Who, there were 6 different variations of the theme tune (or 7 if you count the Delaware theme tune episode of Carnival of Monsters Episode 2 that was sent and broadcast in Australia).In my book the Doctor Who theme music just edges out Dallas by ½ point. Doctor Who instantly reminds me of fond memories growing up with two other brothers and a father also fans of the show. All was quiet in our home on Sunday evenings when this was screened. Despite the distance between us now we all still watch the series and on that rare occasion when we gather we discuss and dissect the current series with vigor.
Which version of the Doctor Who theme tune? In the 1963-1989 classic series of Doctor Who, there were 6 different variations of the theme tune (or 7 if you count the Delaware theme tune episode of Carnival of Monsters Episode 2 that was sent and broadcast in Australia).
Delia Derbyshire Version 3.I'm guessing it might be this one.
I’ve long felt that, instead of JR and Bobby, the “stuck in an elevator” episode should have featured Lucy and Angelica, perhaps with Lucy in one of her preposterous Miss Young Dallas modeling costumes - imagine the crackling dialogue and delicious sexual tension!"Call me ... call me her name --- 'Pamela'..."
![]()
I'm not sure I entirely agree Dallas was the only prime time soap opera to appeal to straight men. I think Dallas made the genre of prime time soaps popular and acceptable amongst men and as a result many went on to watch Falcon Crest Dynasty, Flamingo Road, etc. Dynasty, which was arguably the most camp of these shows, topped the ratings and it could never have done that without a significant number of viewers being straight men.It was the only primetime serial to widely appeal to heterosexual men. That gave it a massive distinction, considering the serial genre (in America at least) had long been considered a woman's medium.
I'm not sure I entirely agree Dallas was the only prime time soap opera to appeal to straight men. I think Dallas made the genre of prime time soaps popular and acceptable amongst men and as a result many went on to watch Falcon Crest Dynasty, Flamingo Road, etc. Dynasty, which was arguably the most camp of these shows, topped the ratings and it could never have done that without a significant number of viewers being straight men.
Another assertion that keeps getting trotted out with no logical basis. The issue is not the dream per se but the wiping out of the season's episodes. They could have had Samantha Stevens twitch her nose with the same result.And the use of the dream would have made far more sense if it had been Bobby's comatose dream
Now, this I agree with wholeheartedly.Well, if they hadn't suppressed Pam's rise at Ewing Oil during the dream season, the JR-vs-Pam dynamic could have produced fireworks -- and moreso than the tired JR-vs-Bobby thing. DALLAS could have coasted on it for several seasons.
Another assertion that keeps getting trotted out with no logical basis. The issue is not the dream per se but the wiping out of the season's episodes. They could have had Samantha Stevens twitch her nose with the same result.
Why is the one more logical than the other?Naturally, wiping out an entire year of plotlines is the major offense. But if you're gonna do it, who would more logically have had the dream??
Why is the one more logical than the other?
I would have thought that somebody, anybody who had not flatlined was more likely to dream.Bobby had flatlined. Nothing on Pam was ever flat.
in the front, anyway..Bobby had flatlined. Nothing on Pam was ever flat.
Naturally, wiping out an entire year of plotlines is the major offense. But if you're gonna do it, who would more logically have had the dream??
Why is the one more logical than the other?
Not a hard question. Larry Hagman as JR Ewing