Debunking the claim that another network wanted to take over the show but the sets had already been destroyed.
Thank You. I think that this a good analysis of a possible season 4
It is possible that there was some initial interest in a season 4 on a surface level, but not much more than an inquiry or two
The sale of the show's episodes is the more likely explanation
With the sets destroyed, most things are a moot point.
I don't know about budget - season 3 seemed to have a really low budget, and just wasn't good at all.
The comedy was ineffective and the villains had become too silly, even for a camp 60s version.
On that note, it took years until Batman returned to its more dramatic roots, at least in the public's mind
Batman was originally written much more seriously as a crimefighter
The Tv series was an outlier, although it was entertaining.
I never cared for the first two movies. the tone was right, but there is no universe in which Michael Keaton
has the physical presence required for the role. Joel Shumaker had the casting much better, but the scripts were not that good
The Christopher Nolan/Christian Bale trilogy had it mostly right. The biggest issue was that the untimely passing of Heath Ledger
changed the third movie - I can't believe that he wouldn't have returned for the third one
"The Batman" - mostly good, but something is missing IMHO, and I can't quite identify it.
Strong reintroduction of the Riddler the Penguin, but Frank Gorshin and Burgess Meredith will always be gold standard
We all want to see the Joker, but some of the other villains have been underused, or not used at all.
Mr Freeze, Croc, Poison Ivy, Clayface (Yes, I know that there is an upcoming Clayface movie, but I prefer the Basil Karlo version)
Scarecrow (OK in the trilogy, but more can be done), Hugo Strange