Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Miss Texas 1967" data-source="post: 14382" data-attributes="member: 36">Serena pushed Blair face first into a cake once too.I don&#039;t think the catfights were nearly as front and centre as they were on Dynasty, but they also weren&#039;t really supposed to be. B &amp; S were much more frenemies than Krystle and Alexis, K &amp; S didn&#039;t have a friendship element.Gossip Girl was a good show for it&#039;s core audience. Some parts toward the middle and end became a bit too boring/stupid/unbelievable, but for what it was, a teen drama, it definitely hit it&#039;s mark. Dynasty (original) has a different audience than GG to begin with; the new Dynasty show will need to make it&#039;s own mark, it cannot be a GG 2.0 and it cannot be a straight remake of the original (there are a number of things that may not translate well). I do think if it&#039;s done well though, new Dynasty could very well have a new audience as well as keeping the original viewers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Miss Texas 1967, post: 14382, member: 36"] Serena pushed Blair face first into a cake once too. I don't think the catfights were nearly as front and centre as they were on Dynasty, but they also weren't really supposed to be. B & S were much more frenemies than Krystle and Alexis, K & S didn't have a friendship element. Gossip Girl was a good show for it's core audience. Some parts toward the middle and end became a bit too boring/stupid/unbelievable, but for what it was, a teen drama, it definitely hit it's mark. Dynasty (original) has a different audience than GG to begin with; the new Dynasty show will need to make it's own mark, it cannot be a GG 2.0 and it cannot be a straight remake of the original (there are a number of things that may not translate well). I do think if it's done well though, new Dynasty could very well have a new audience as well as keeping the original viewers. [/QUOTE]

Verification

What month follows July?