What was the last film you watched?

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Miracle on 34th Street (1947)
It's the original all the way for me. :)
I watched this today too.

Miracle on 34th Street (1947)

220px-Miracle_on_34th_Street_%281947_film_poster%29.jpg


I've lost count of how many times I've watched this film but I'm sure it's over 10 and I never get bored with it. It's such a lovely tale of innocent and joy that is perfect for Christmas. Having watched the remake a few days ago, it's interesting to compare them and the 1947 version is much superior. The resolution of the film might be a bit too simplistic for a more cynical modern audience but you have to suspend a level of belief to truly enjoy a film like this.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
A Christmas Carol (1951 & 1984)

I watched them both this morning as it’s really not Christmas to me without watching at least one version of this classic tale. These are probably my two favorite Christmas movies, with the Alistair Sim version winning out in the end. I don’t think anyone played the role of Ebenezer Scrooge better, although George C. Scott was a great Scrooge in his own right.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
The resolution of the film might be a bit too simplistic for a more cynical modern audience but you have to suspend a level of belief to truly enjoy a film like this.
Yes, it's pure fantasy. I dislike the way the remakes are rewritten so that the denouement is someone's deliberate ploy. They're trying to inject an element of realism where none need exist. After all, "faith is believing in things when common sense tells you not to."
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Cinderella (2015)

iu

(I didn't watch in IMAX, but I do love this poster)

Of all the live-action karaoke remakes Disney have done in recent years I suspect Cinderella is the one I'll most enjoy because, while the original has some terrific scenes and moments, it also has a lot of filler with the helium-voiced mice and the silly antics of Jaq and Gus*. Thankfully, the mice in the live action version are far more tolerable.

It's a little surprising to find that practically the entire cast of this Disney film is non-American. Most of the cast are British, bolstered by a number of other Europeans and - of course - at least one Australian. But with dialogue coming from an American screenwriter and most of the under 40s in the cast speaking with contemporary RP rather than traditional, it still feels very American in tone and speech patterns.

From what I'd previously known of the show, I understood that Helena Bonham Carter stole the show. Fun as she was, I was most impressed by Cate Blanchett as Lady Tremaine. She certainly looked the part and gave great villainess, with a dash of the Sable Colby to her at times.









*The animated Aladdin suffers similarly with the OTT antics of Robin Williams rendering an otherwise top tier film almost unwatchable for me, but I'm not convinced Will Smith will be that much of an improvement.
 

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Boxing Day (2021)

10299_7456.jpg


I'm not a massive fan of romantic comedies but this seemed like an appropriate film to watch yesterday. A film about a writer who proposes to his girlfriend and later bumps into his ex who is still in love with him. It's the usual romcom stuff but this seems more original because unusually, the cast is predominantly black. It's nice hearing black slang and references to things in black Caribbean culture but it's a film with universal appeal to all races. It's a light piece of entertainment that doesn't tax the viewer too much which I suppose is what many would like from a film on Boxing Day. It's not Shakespeare but it's not terrible either.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
The Wizard of Oz (1939)

I watched it over the weekend. I know it’s not considered a Christmas movie but for some reason I have to watch it over the holidays every year. It’s a film that never gets old for me. I remember seeing it for the first time when I was six, and about 41 years later I’m still very much hooked on it.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
1640824810175.png

Forget about Airplane! and Hot Shots!, this is the real thing.
A previously unseen blockbuster from the 1970s so I figured I was going to enjoy it regardless, but it's exceeded those expectations.

CAPRICORN ONE is an everything but the kitchen sink satirical/parodic take on both the conspiracy theory and disaster movie genre, including a few nods to movie dialogue staples.
Even though it's obvious from the very beginning that it's not meant to be taken seriously, the movie manages to create the dread of a no-win situation for everyone involved. Once it's happening there's no turning back and the story largely focuses on that part rather than the "what if?" of the scam itself.

This is 2021 and we've seen it all and we've become very smart and yet I had no idea where the story would take me, especially in the first half of the movie.
The performances are convincing when it matters but because it's not serious-epic there are no seriously epic theatrics in the style of the Bruce Willis heroes. And thank God for that.
There's enough suspense and action thrills to keep the viewer engaged for the whole two hours (it didn't feel like two hours) and in a funny twist the Mars-landing-that-didn't-happen turns into a survival-on-Planet-Earth story and the encounters with its alien-esque inhabitants.
The ending is rather abrupt and intentionally cheesy but that's all right because I didn't need more information, and the idea that it stops one moment before it ends kinda gives it a heartrending quality.
And if that's still not enough: Brenda Vaccaro is in it too.

It's not as quirky as Twin Peaks or Fargo (except that a younger and sexy O.J. Simpson is a surreal thing to watch, but that has nothing to do with the movie) but because it works on both - well, all - levels it achieves the same thing.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
No Down Payment (1957)
I've been meaning to watch this for some time. It's David Jacob's "other" inspiration for Knots Landing and it really is very like Knots's first season - much more so than Scenes From a Marriage.
It's like all the various character traits have been thrown up in the air and fallen into different combinations.
It's also interesting to see actors like Pat Hingle and Cameron Mitchell in their prime - previously I'd only ever seen them older in supporting roles. For instance, a heavier Hingle as Commissioner Gordon in 1989's Batman. I had no idea that he'd ever been a leading man. Tony Randall also does well in a dramatic role - the Richard Avery of the piece, if you will - rather different from the light comedies for which he's now best remembered.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
1641040393126.png

A remake of CRAIG'S WIFE (1936) which was based on a Broadway play.
This third version still has a lot of that theatre style in both the physical and vocal performances, and if you're looking for subtlety then you're not going to find it here.
The movie opens with a jolly, faux-hysterical scene reminiscent of the typical kitchen havoc in UPSTAIRS DOWNSTAIRS (or any of those light-hearted British "bonnet" dramas) and for a moment I thought that this movie wasn't for me.
After that, the reason for all the panic is revealed as being Joan Crawford who delivers her lines at high-speed, and for the second time I began to doubt my choice for youtube-movie-of-the-day.
Thankfully it doesn't take long to see what this Harriet Craig is all about: a bossy control freak who makes it very clear that the main staircase is not meant to be trampled on by servants, and that was reason enough for me to take the bait.

Her diva-esque behaviour is rooted in a fear of loss and abadonment which is based on her belief that all men are genetically designed to cause exactly that, intentional or not.
In a way it reminded me of Sable Colby who was also fighting a problem that wasn't really there, and that problem became a reality because of her shenanigans.
The problem (real or not) was more high-stakes in THE COLBYS but I find the angle rather similar.
The wife of Mr. Craig's boss is the Constance Patterson who complicates the situation even further, and not without a whiff of glee.

All of that still isn't an excuse for the way Harriet treats the people around her and yet I found myself rooting for her a little bit.
She's created her imaginary "perfect" world and she desperately tries to hold on to it which suggests an appreciation for what she has, her warped interpretation thereof notwithstanding.
But at least she's not greedy, she doesn't want more.

The uploader has classified HARRIET CRAIG as film noir so I expected something more sinister in the style of ALL ABOUT EVE.
Harriet's niece Clare (played by LeAnn Rimes look-alike K.T. Stevens) seems a little too devoted to her aunt's well-being and Harriet's know-nothing-about-anything husband Walter seems a little too comfortable with his wife's endless list of rules and demands.
Influenced by the misguided "film noir" tag I was waiting for the murder plot to happen. That doesn't happen and that itself is not a problem but it does make Walter and Clare look very weak and gullible, to the point of suspending disbelief.
Oddly enough that makes them even more unlikeable than the could-have-been murder plotters. It's almost as if they deserve the Harriet Craig treatment.
This also applies to the widow neighbour and her cute kid (I found him terribly annoying).

The soapiest part is when Harriet sabotages Walter's promotion, a promotion that could lead to the top of the company. Again, Harriet is not interested in more or bigger, she wants exactly what she already has.
The sabotage scene looks remarkably subtle (by soap standards anyway) and it's yet another thing that would suit THE COLBYS very well.
I'm not sure where to place the reveal of her faked barrenness other than being the final nail in the coffin, a coffin that had looked pretty nailed down from the outset.
The momentum just isn't there.
And so the story ends with everything she's desperately tried to avoid, but since I simply couldn't expect a different outcome it all feels a bit underwhelming.
Not that the ending or final twist is the most important part of a movie - to me it's more important to enjoy what's happening on screen rather than the analyses afterwards - but it does help to make the story linger on.
Perhaps I've watched it the wrong way, perhaps it was meant to be watched as a comedy of sorts. Come to think of it, that makes more sense.
 

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Being The Riccardos (2021)

MV5BNDlmZDU5MmUtNWFmMy00OTQ1LTk1YTctOTI3ZmU1YzZiYmZmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDM2NDM2MQ@@._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg


I have seen a few episodes of I Love Lucy when they used to repeat them on Channel 4 in the UK around 30 years ago at 6 o'clock in the morning. I liked the show so I thought this film would be an interesting watch. I wasn't wrong. I found the film to be engrossing. The casting seemed a bit odd as neither of the leads look like the characters they played but their performances are so good that you don't mind that in the slightest. I am overly emotional in most circumstances and the J Edgar Hoover bit at the end (can't say more as I don't want to spoil it for those who haven't seen it) did move me even though it was pure fiction. A film that is well worth watching.
 

darkshadows38

Telly Talk Star
LV
1
 
Awards
7
my folks watched that recently and found it boring well my mom did i dunno about my dad i forgot to ask him, as for E.T. i can't remember the date it came out on but i was either 3 or 4 when it came out and it's the 1st movie i ever saw on the big screen the only part that i remember to this day cause i fell asleep on it is when they are sick or rather when they get sick and are taken into that chamber of sorts.

as for the last film i watched the last of the year it was a bad one called "Mary" (2019) with Gary Oldman a horror movie i bought for a buck at Dollar Tree and it wasn't painfully bad like so many others the acting was good the fx were decent. and it had a couple decent ideas it just wasn't all that scary for one thing, plus it's pretty much a movie that's been done a thousand times a family finds a haunted ship and it starts killing people off.... i was waiting for the twist ending and it came for those who have seen Ghost Ship (2002) which is a pretty decent film i just didn't like the ending with the twist at the end that's all well this one ends like that but unlike that

which had a far better script and that one was pure horror not about a family but a group of people being killed off. for those who want a better horror film that's about a haunted ship pick that one instead. it's a far better movie and it's got this damn good flashback scene at the end where when you see the start of the film it makes more sense when you watch the flashback at the end and you find out how it got haunted this film Mary? nope you don't even get that my rating for Mary i think i gave it a 5/10 or was it 6/10? i forget
 
K

Karin Schill

Guest
The last movie I watched was a Swedish Christmas movie called "Jag Kommer Hem Igen Till Jul" from 2019. I loved it since it was not your traditional Christmas movie but actually dealt with some rather heavy subject matters I wasn't expecting to see in a Christmas movie. At the core of the story are two brothers, one who is living in the hometown and one who became a star who moved to LA. Then for Christmas the brothers are reunited. The father has recently died and the mother is sick. The movie is in Swedish but if anyone is interested to check it out here's a trailer for it.

 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
Mommie Dearest (1981)

A thread we had recently discussing Joan Crawford made me feel like going back and watch this for the first time in many years. It wasn’t as great a movie as I remembered but it’s still very entertaining to say the least. Whether you agree or disagree with its content or whatever you think of Christina Crawford for writing the book in the first place, this movie is quite interesting to see. I feel it holds up well for a 40 year old movie that was mostly set even a few decades before that.
 
Top