Mustard
Telly Talk TV Fanatic
Yes, Dunne was brought in just before Bobby's death for "prep" purposes.
Are you sure that it was Katzman who created Angelica Nero rather than Dunne? I somehow don't think the way Angelica developed was Katzman's idea.
Yes, Dunne was brought in just before Bobby's death for "prep" purposes.
Yes, the way Nero developed was not to Katzman's liking -- he wanted her gone after less than a dozen episodes, but Dunne and his team of writers extended her stay.Are you sure that it was Katzman who created Angelica Nero rather than Dunne? I somehow don't think the way Angelica developed was Katzman's idea.

Wow! That is a much better way of handling the dilemma of bringing Bobby back. It makes so much more sense.Wasn't it Patrick's wife who suggested the dream?
Very interesting topic though and I agree - had the season ended with with all the cliffhangers it would have been fantastic anyway, the shower scene wasn't needed. What they should have done was have a scenario where one of the family around the bed at the end of the previous season somehow managed to kill someone, with the last shot of their face being the freeze frame...Pam probably - and that would then be the first image we see when the show returned, as Bobby wakes from his coma. They could have then have had it as Bobby's dream, with flashbacks throughout that season.
So yes I agree, ths shower scene was a needless cliffhanger IMO.
That's a good point! Dreams are very non-sequitur.Maybe Ellien could've been dreaming about Bobby?
But really, I would've wanted them to go Twin Peaksy before Twin Peaks - just loads of unrelated scenes that might've made us go "wtf" - because that's dreams. Unpredictable.
Having Bobby show up at Mark and Pam's wedding would definitely have been much more interesting.View attachment 4593 Thought this gem might be appropriate to post here. If only this had really happened instead. Such fun!
Too common in daytime soap operas ...Having Bobby show up at Mark and Pam's wedding would definitely have been much more interesting.
Having Bobby show up at Mark and Pam's wedding would definitely have been much more interesting.
That was a fake script they got. Enquirer was a rag, but when it came time to reveal spoilers and bust scoops, they were the best.View attachment 4593 Thought this gem might be appropriate to post here. If only this had really happened instead. Such fun!
CBS actually teased this in their promos. They showed the scene where Pam and Mark are in front of their wedding guests before saying their vows, and people are turning around, with the announcer saying “Patrick Duffy returns!” So we thought he’d show up at the wedding.Having Bobby show up at Mark and Pam's wedding would definitely have been much more interesting.
Exactly and that's something which I don't I like - generating certain expectations and not delivering. It seems like there must have been a tremendous amount of politics going on. Sure the show lost some viewers but it was still in the topten. It speaks volumes that TPTB did not sack Katzman when he drove the show in the ground both in ratings in quality.CBS actually teased this in their promos. They showed the scene where Pam and Mark are in front of their wedding guests before saying their vows, and people are turning around, with the announcer saying “Patrick Duffy returns!” So we thought he’d show up at the wedding.
CBS actually teased this in their promos. They showed the scene where Pam and Mark are in front of their wedding guests before saying their vows, and people are turning around, with the announcer saying “Patrick Duffy returns!” So we thought he’d show up at the wedding.
While the show ranked in the top 10 for the overall season, that average factored in relatively strong ratings for the first half of the season. Ratings in the second half of the season dropped dramatically and episodes in the spring of 1986 were ranking around #15 in the weekly ratings. Those episodes showed a year over year loss o over 20% of the audience.Exactly and that's something which I don't I like - generating certain expectations and not delivering. It seems like there must have been a tremendous amount of politics going on. Sure the show lost some viewers but it was still in the topten.
I had read he was back by March...Does anyone know at what point during the dream season that Patrick agreed to come back?
No more stupid than what we got. Not bad at all.If we're going to keep that shower scene, I wanted it preceded by a gasp from Pam as she exits her wedding on Mark's arm. We get a shot of the crowded sidewalk on the opposing side of the street -- we sense Pam has seen something but it's no longer there.
The morning after the wedding, she gets up, goes to the shower, opens the door, and Pam finds Bobby who gives her a "good morning!" and a freeze frame.
But as the next season starts, we see Pam at the shower door, and only pink tile. She's confused. The camera pans down and it's Graison dead on the floor of the shower. She screams. By the start of the next episode, after Bobby explains what happened and why he'd been thought dead for a year, Pam realizes that she'd indeed seen Bobby across the street from her wedding, and that and the stress over Graison dying caused her to hallucinate that Bobby was in her bathroom sudsing up.
Too stupid?
Phillip Capice added his touch, his best work being Season 6 when DALLAS was pure sensational and fire. The problem with an ensemble show is when it's run by ONE mind, things go bad fast and there are no other alternatives to fix problems- I find it hard to believe the Dream Scenario was the best fix, and that came from outside the circle- Patrick's, now late, wife!Exactly and that's something which I don't I like - generating certain expectations and not delivering. It seems like there must have been a tremendous amount of politics going on. Sure the show lost some viewers but it was still in the topten. It speaks volumes that TPTB did not sack Katzman when he drove the show in the ground both in ratings in quality.
He simply did not care to provide some explanation to resurrect Bobby. He said he didn't a grip on the (dream season's) storylines and therefore made it a dream (although he wrote whole episodes) - it's just bizarre.
Dallas was an ensemble show onscreen and not just the Bobby&JR show like in its last years.
I think that was the same problem behind the scenes. It did not work with just Katzman and/or Phil Capice with fill power. The first year's success was the work of Bernhard Lewis, Paulsen, Lee Rich... and many more and recently I read how Marchetta had contributed to "Who shot JR" and the "Moldavian Massacre").
It was a very successful ensemble of writers, story editors, directors and producers...
How can you not recognize the great work of Bradford May? Too much power for one person, that was the problem.
Phillip Capice added his touch, his best work being Season 6 when DALLAS was pure sensational and fire. The problem with an ensemble show is when it's run by ONE mind, things go bad fast and there are no other alternatives to fix problems- I find it hard to believe the Dream Scenario was the best fix, and that came from outside the circle- Patrick's, now late, wife!