tommie
Telly Talk Hero
The difference is that Friends stayed on top until the end and it was the actors who ended it, not the network. Dallas of course plummeted, making it hard to justify doling out $350 000 per episode to Larry Hagman. Had Dallas actually continued to be in the top ten, then I'm sure Larry would've made even more plus there probably wouldn't have been so many cuts into the cast.Yes Larry was without a doubt the highest paid actor on Dallas. He made a lot of money and yet a couple of years later "the kids from Friends" made 1 million dollars/episode. Yet I don't think they were better actors than he was. But of course the cast of Friends negotiated as a team, had equal pay and as a result had all their cast until the end, knew when to pull the plug on the show and went out on top after 10 successful seasons.
Add that comedies on top of that have better syndication prospects than continuing dramas (Friends make about one billion per years for Warners).
Last edited:
The combination of Larry and Angela would have been ratings gold. Alexis Carrington & Co. wouldn't have stood a chance.
