What was the last film you watched?

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I seem to remember that the end of episode shot of Sheila being dragged into the bushes was cut from that week's omnibus. You heard it, but didn't see it.

Oh, that's interesting. I'm fairly sure I missed that entirely the first time around (omnibus included) so I'm glad to have that context. Now you mention it, I remember similar cuts being ordered for certain episodes of EastEnders (Angie's overdose springs to mind) and Corrie (Brian's stabbing, which I seem to remember was also one of the earliest Corrie omnibuses), but have no memory at all for which Brookie episodes got this treatment.

I do remember reading that Sue Johnston filmed a lot more of that sequence in the woods but it ended up cut and never made it to air.




The way I remember it, nobody liked those films unless there was something saucy or controversial in it.

Oh, that sounds like a challenge for filmmakers... daring them to make something risqué enough that people will actually watch it.




Perhaps the biggest fame was Dutch actress Sylvia Kristel in the French film Emanuelle (1974) which, incidentally, was the first film in what would become the first - and to this day, most extensive - movie franchise.

I've heard of the films, of course. Although I'm actually more familiar with the parody Carry On Emmannuelle, itself one of the final entries in that very long-running franchise (and generally considered one of the worst).
 

Monzo

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Awards
9
I watched A Hero, which won the Grand Prix at the Cannes Film Festival in 2021. For this reason, I had high expectations of the film, which were neither fulfilled nor disappointed.


It is a strong film that I probably won't remember very well because there wasn't a moment that really touched me.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
It is a strong film that I probably won't remember very well because there wasn't a moment that really touched me.
Last year I watched LEVIATHAN (2014) mostly because I'm intrigued by "the way things go in Russia".
The story is OK but there's nothing spectacular about it, but I will never forget it because of this scene:
It sounds like those funny, high-speed disclaimers or warnings at the end of a radio or TV commercial, except in this scene it goes on and on and on. And on.
The best part is that it's not clear if it's meant to be funny (I suspect it was) but there's no comedic tone in the context of the story.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
I have no idea how it compares to HOWARDS END (what? no apostrophe?) but I plan to find out.

1724244503789.png

Whereas REMAINS has that enticing stiff-upper-lip atmosphere and meticulous narrative from the very beginning, HOWARDS END has a rather messy start.
There are various scenes that are not strongly connected, there are three youg men with blond hair therefore it's difficult to see who's-in-what-scene, and after 30 minutes I still didn't know who or what the main focus of the film was going to be.
The only reason I kept watching was because of Vanessa Redgrave's character, while hoping the story would find its groove, as it were.

But no, it actually becomes much messier and maybe that's not what I expected or wanted from this film, but it's what I needed.
It's as gorgeous as all the other Merchant Ivory productions but at the same time I think it's also the darkest thing they've ever done.
Ruth Wilcox (Redgrave) comes across as a likeable character because she befriends Emma Thompson and they talk about the trees and the lovely meadows, but it's the innocent and passive snobbery that makes her such a monster. Sobbing about the demolition of a fancy house someone happened to be born in while the working class struggles to find a decent home they can afford.
"I can't understand that people would want to live in flats" - it's because it's slim pickings for the ordinary peeps but she doesn't even understand that, or doesn't want to.

Unlike Krystle Carrington, Emma Thompson does not succeed in redeeming husband Antony Hopkins, but there's also a scene in which they're dancing excitedly in his office, and in that moment they are the likeable protagonists.
This dual mood continues until the very end, it's what makes it a little problematic but also very interesting and unpredictable.
Is it about good people doing or saying ugly things or is it about ugly people doing something good every now and then? It's hard to say, to be honest.

The tragedy at the very end looks a bit silly but also shocking as the aristocrat literally hits the poor man when he's down.
There are plenty of humorous moments, mostly because of Charles and Dolly Wilcox, an unexpected reveal from the past, Helena Bonham Carter's character's quest for justice even though it doesn't seem to be appreciated by anyone, a frustratingly unfulfilled romance (but not without consequences) and then there's Howards End itself which isn't nearly as important to the story as the beginning suggested.

Messy, but in a very, very good way.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
In The Electric Mist (2009)

iu

One of those spontaneous viewings, with the film randomly plucked from a shortlist of titles leaving Prime in the next few days.

I read a bit of the description but didn't clock the protagonist's name, so was pleasantly surprised to find I was watching a film based on an entry from James Lee Burke's Robicheaux series. This series had been recommended to me many years ago and I bought one of the novels but couldn't get into it, which I felt a little bad about.

Curiously, this film is based on the sixth novel. It's also not the first Robicheaux adaption: Alec Baldwin had previously played the character thirteen years earlier in an adaption of the second. I have no idea whether or not Electric Mist is the ideal starting point, but as a standalone piece it worked. If anything, any baggage from groundwork done in previous stories added texture here and I didn't feel I was missing anything apart from what the writer wanted to audience to feel they were missing (if that makes sense).

Describing the film's appeal is difficult. There's a lot that really should have been a struggle. The diction was a biggie: not just the thick accents of the characters, but the lack of enunciation. A key characteristic of the Southern drawl - as presented here, at least - is the tendency to mumble. It felt like most of the time characters were pushing dialogue downwards into their own chests, where it would become forever distorted and lost. Subtitles for an English-speaking film are an anathema to me and I didn't use them... but I think I may have have understood the plot better if I had.

Casting was really good overall. Tommie Lee Jones was suitably world-weary, and I think I've underestimated his acting talents as he gave a really nice performance*. Mary Steenbergen was a comforting presence, while Ned Beatty was practically unrecognisable compared with other works in which I've seen him. The weakest links in the cast were the actresses playing the actress (ironically) and Robicheaux's daughter (who just felt too much like a kid who knows she's in a film and wants to be endearing). Neither was bad... they just weren't up to the standard of those around them. Mileage will vary on whether or not John Goodman being ever-recognisable as John Goodman is a good thing for the film, but I was invested enough in the story for it to work.

Even with the odd obstacle, I found the entire thing absorbing. The Louisiana settings are full of character and quite attractive, which contrasts nicely with some brutally ugly goings on and language. There was something curiously comfortable about the film and even though it didn't overtly wow me, I still feel I could settle down and watch several more just like it.



* As fine an actor as Alec Baldwin is, I can't help feeling he was too young and too pretty in 1996 to play a character written as a grizzled fifty-something. Image searches for Heaven's Prisoners bear this out. I'd probably still be up for watching it, though.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Dockers (1999)

iu

The first thing that grabbed me about this film was the very large number of writers. A bigger team seemed to be involved in this than would write an American sitcom. The only two names I recognised were Jimmy McGovern and Irvine Welsh. This became clear at the end when text on the screen informed the viewer that the film was the first project of a group of the sacked dockers, some of whom were involved in writing. Reading up on it, this was apparently "an experiment in 'democratic television'", and a little of the process can be seen here with Jimmy and a few of the writers:

It's wonderfully written. I feared the number of writers might muddy things but it's a very intimate film. Casting and performances, too, are spot-on. There were a few familiar faces: Ricky "Bobby Grant" Tomlinson, Lee "Dodger" Ross and Peter "Bill Webster" Armitage being the best-known to me. Incidentally, when I read Peter Armitage's name on screen, I confused him with Peter Adamson (a nice bit of casting, I thought, with him being from Liverpool) and spent the first third of the film marvelling at how young the Len Fairclough actor looked with his hair dyed. Then it dawned on me it wasn't him at all (it was Ken Stott). It's a little bizarre to see Ricky Tomlinson playing a scab for part of the film when it would be an anathema to his Brookie character (and no doubt Ricky himself).The lesser-known (to me) faces were great too. Crissy Rock was given some really nice moments and did good things with them.

As a Jimmy Mac project, this is typically political, edgy, realistic and proudly Liverpudlian. I found it fascinating to watch the first act without a clue what was really going on, slowly fitting the pieces together. There's very little information that's spoon-fed to the audience. We just discover them organically as they go about their lives.

I knew very little about the Dockers' Strikes so I found the film informative. Watching early Brookside has given me a taste for the union politics and there's plenty of that here. We see families torn apart by different viewpoints and really get a sense of the devastation caused. The fallout has parallels with McGovern's earlier Hillsborough, which I watched very recently, and also with Pride which has the backdrop of the Miners' Strike of the mid-Eighties.

Worth viewing for the background and unique production process alone. Besides which it's a great film.

 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
Klondike (1932)
About a doctor who tries to start a new life in Alaska after being accused of manslaughter when one of is patients dies after brain surgery.
Klondike is both a place name and the name of his potential love interest played by, you guessed it, Thelma Todd. The name strikes me as rather unattractive for a person, and the fact that the YouTube subtitles occasionally render it as "Clown Dyke" doesn't help.
 

DallasFanForever

Telly Talk Supreme
LV
5
 
Awards
17
Reagan (2024)

I didn’t know what to expect from this going in, and I’m not the most politically driven person when it comes to making decisions so my reasons for seeing this were more because I grew up in the 80s and therefore grew up during the entire Reagan administration as well.

I was surprised at how much ground they covered, from his acting career to his marriage to Jane Wyman all the way up to his run for Governor and eventually the presidency. It was certainly a full life and made for an interesting story. I enjoyed this movie very much.
 

James from London

International Treasure
LV
6
 
Awards
18
The French Connection v Get Carter

Did a 1971 crime double bill as both films were about to fall off the iPlayer. I've seen them both before but not for years and years. The French Connection is as exciting but difficult to follow (I blame myself) as I remember, while Get Carter is even more gloriously grubby and fantastically nasty than I was expecting.

I guess you could say that each is about one man (Gene Hackman/Michael Caine) pounding the mean streets (of New York and Newcastle respectively) on an all-consuming quest for what he considers justice (busting a heroin ring/avenging a brother's death) with scant regard for the collateral damage that accumulates along the way. But apart from that (and plenty of early '70s sex), they're as different as can be. Hackman's character is a cop. Caine's most definitely isn't.

The scenes involving club singers neatly illustrate the contrasting vibe of each film.


 
Last edited:

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
Yesterday (2019)
After a freak accident, a man finds himself the only person who remembers the Beatles. Indeed, the Beatles seem to have been wiped from history altogether.
It's really only a one-joke story, albeit with an unexpectedly emotional climax. But the logical underpinning doesn't stand up to close scrutiny.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Crocodile (2000)

iu

It's bad. It's as bad as the cover suggests. It's as bad as the reviews say.

And I have nobody to blame but myself considering I bought a DVD copy over 20 years ago for something like £1.99 in Woolies and thought it was terrible at the time. 'But no', I thought, mind opened to new and exciting possibilities. 'It might be better than I remember.'

It's a little bit frightening to revisit what still feels to me like a new film and suddenly realise it's a period piece. In terms of the character types, it's clear we're in immediately-post-Scream-era with everyone attempting (and failing) to channel the same cynicism and wit. Nobody's really distinguishable from the person next to them, and there's very little screen presence (kind of like some of the kids from Jaws 2, but much, much blander). And they're all so unlikeable (in fact, the ones who are meant to be the "nice" ones are possibly the least-likeable). It also struck me that this film has bland teens and Tobe Hooper's traditional "Hicksploitation" type characters (the grotesque locals would have fitted comfortably into The Texas Chain Saw Massacre) and nothing in between.

The effects are poor. Ten minutes in the sledgehammer writing tells us exactly who is going to survive and who isn't. More time is spent on tedious, shallow love triangles than the main story. But there's still some perverse entertainment to be found in watching. And I can't explain why.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
The Professor and the Madman (2019)
About the compilation of the first Oxford Dictionary, an interesting film on a number of levels: the determination of Mel Gibson's "professor", the kinship he finds with Sean Penn's "madman" (actually suffering from schizophrenia before such a thing was recognised). and of course the progress of the dictionary itself.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
BRAZIL (1985)

1726920417771.png

This has been my most-wanted film for quite a while even though it's all there on "that other website we often visit".
I tried to watch it then but found the spoken dialogue impossible to follow. It didn't help to adjust the volume because that also increased the loudness of the score and every other sound effect.
For some reason the DVD was kinda difficult to find but a few days ago I found a brand new copy for only 8 euros.
It's an Italian import but the image on amazon guaranteed English audio and subtitles. I was a little surprised to find out that it also has French and Dutch subtitles - which means that it isn't an Italian release but an Italian made European release.
Well, anyway, the subtitles made it possible to find the perfect compromise regarding dialogue vs. score and now I've finally watched the whole thing.

It's really great in every aspect, a bonafide masterpiece if you like, but the feeling I had was sort of like The Eurythmics in Willy WonkaLand. There's none of that synthpop music in it but at the same time there's something distinctively nostalgic eighties about it.
I usually find it difficult to buy into dystopian scenarios because it suggests that the worst thing has already happened, dramatically speaking it has nowhere to go.
But Brazil does it from a 1940s point of view and the result is brilliantly convoluted and hilarious. Even if nothing happened then it would still be a very entertaining film.
Bob Hoskins plays an heating engineer villain and Robert De Niro plays an heating engineer superhero. You'll never see that in any other film.
I think Jonathan Pryce was born to play this role and it must have been a challenge to always be "in the moment" in such a non-stop energetic production.

It is perhaps the most perfect title for a film that doesn't actually happen in Brazil, and the variations on the Brazil theme are beautifully done. The only version I knew was the disco remake by the Ritchie Family.

 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
BARBIE (2023)

1726924280191.png

I decided to ignore BARBIE while it was still in the midst of its hype, so last night I watched it for the first time.

After the introduction or BarbieLand (I'm a sucker for life-size toy/cartoon worlds but the pink overload made me feel a little nauseous) the story starts with the impending crisis courtesy of the person playing with Barbie. This part reminded me of the perfect sitcom world of Pleasantville gettin upset by the real world teenagers.
Once Barbie and Ken arrive in the real world it becomes a mix of parody and homage, and the trick is to find the right balance so that nothing has to be sacrificed.
It's not as good as Galaxy Quest but I thought it was getting pretty close.

Then at some point the real world mother starts a passionate speech about the hardship of being a woman (as if being man doesn't come with any expectations at all) and this really took me out of the fantasy. It felt like a bad moment of telling rather than showing.
But then suddenly it struck me that everything she said doesn't make sense in the context of role reversed BarbieLand.
In fact it is Ken (the film's temporary antagonist) whose story arc is told from a female oppressed point of view, and this should immediately take the sting out of any alleged wokeness.
And while it may be dressed up as a liberation of women from the real world's point of view, BarbieLand itself strongly advocates and even battles for the idea that is "in fact" perfectly alright to aim for pretty airheadedness and fantasies about super careers that don't mean a thing. But from a child's point of view it doesn't have to mean anything and it's really only about acting out fantasies.
I think this is why both the film and Mattel are massively getting away with it. The critique simply makes way for the reinforcement of Barbie.

It's got tons of gags and even if I didn't laugh at everything then at least there wasn't anything in it that annoyed me. I had no idea Will Ferrell could be so funny.
There's also no holding back when it comes to the Ken jokes, and I just loved all of it. And he also got the songs.

So when all that great stuff has happened I guess they didn't want to compromise its ending by giving Barbie and Ken a happily ever after.
Barbie going into the real world "Little Mermaid" style could also be interpreted as Barbie leaving the film and return to the shelves of the toy stores where all toys belong until they're being chosen by someone who wants to play with them.

I'm not sure if we needed a Barbie film, and the fact that they managed to produce a great Barbie film makes it even more special imo.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
SAINT MAUD (2019)

1726925797793.png

From my chronological viewing experience this is "Part III" in the Religious Young Woman In Big Trouble Trilogy (First Omen, Immaculate).
A part of this film has the familiar vibe of a person being too interested in another person, but all things considered I think it marches to the beat of its own drum.
It's possible to see a little bit of TAXI DRIVER in it - either way, it's the winner in this unofficial trilogy.


GOODFELLAS (1990)

1726927282804.png

I have no idea why it's taken me so long to watch this critically acclaimed and universally loved masterpiece. It's not as if I had tried to avoid it so I guess I just forgot all about it.
I don't know what other people saw in this film, but to me it looked like a buch of totally uncharismatic, horrible characters doing horrible things. And something about loyalty.
And there's a narrator to guide me through the whole banal experience, perhaps it was meant to give this film a Woody Allen-style wholesomeness? Whatever it was it didn't work for me at all.
Even as a biopic it doesn't have any merits. Henry Hill who ?
Bah!
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
CUL-DE-SAC (1966)

1726961271542.png

When I think of Polanski classics such as Repulsion and Rosemary's Baby then I get the idea that it looked the way it was meant to be, and the casting of Catherine Deneuve and Mia Farrow makes perfect sense.
Cul-De-Sac has much more of a one hit wonder feel to it, and I mean that it's more difficult to imagine that someone wanted to do it such-and-so way with this-and-that actors.
It's almost as if they were already there, not connected, a sightseeing chance meeting, and Polanski simply had the foresight to see the pieces of the puzzle. And then, somehow, convinced them to go along with it.

There are moments of traditional comedy sketch but it gets a bit muffled by the tone and setting of the story. It looks like the focus is on characters being funny and eccentric rather than situational comedy. There's never a build-up to anything, all the great stuff happens out of the blue. Well, seemingly.
For such an oddball film (but not too oddball by 1960s standards) I find it surprisingly quotable.
In the second part of the film the George/Teresa/Richard trio is visited by friends of George, and since they don't know how to explain the presence of Richard he acts like the gardener who is sort of/sort of not the butler.
It's really funny to see how Teresa behaves like she's having the upper hand even though that's not the case at all.
I always love bad kids in movies, Cul-De-Sac has Horace, his mother's "little treasure", who seems ripe for the Willy Wonka treatment.

The cosey and isolated location also gives the film a strong holiday vibe and it's just one of several reasons that makes this film very rewatchable.
Jacqueline Bisset is in it too, apparently, but she's hiding behind big dark glasses. How very "Jackie" of her.
Françoise Dorléac as the laissez-faire young wife of eccentric Donald Pleasance (with somewhat artistic ambitions) makes me think of women like Anita Pallenberg and especially Amanda Lear who was living with Salvador Dali at that time.
But then again, it was the 1960s...and perhaps this film is a quintessential example of it. Starring Lionel Stander! It still doesn't make much sense but if this is the result then I'm not complaining.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
The French Connection v Get Carter

Did a 1971 crime double bill as both films were about to fall off the iPlayer. I've seen them both before but not for years and years. The French Connection is as exciting but difficult to follow (I blame myself) as I remember, while Get Carter is even more gloriously grubby and fantastically nasty than I was expecting.

Well, you planted the seed for me to watch Get Carter while it was still on iPlayer. And it was my first time.

I can see why these two films were grouped together since they both have that disorientating thing where stuff is going on but the viewer needs to resort to empirical evidence to work out what the actual story is. In fact iPlayer even tried to force me to auto-watch The French Connection immediately afterwards.

Lots of good stuff here: the locations look good (I especially loved the shot of the two hearses pulling away from the back of the house, down that steep lane overlooking industrial Newcastle); the score is a classic, and the only part of the film with which I was familiar before watching; there are some familiar faces (including Alf Roberts himself) and that Sunbeam Alpine is (or was) gorgeous.



The scenes involving club singers neatly illustrate the contrasting vibe of each film.

Oh - the video cuts off at the funniest part: the knicker-flashing catfight between the singer and the jealous wife while all the blokes watch in amused, world-weary approval.







But then again, it was the 1960s...and perhaps this film is a quintessential example of it. Starring Lionel Stander! It still doesn't make much sense but if this is the result then I'm not complaining.

You summed it up with the word "oddball", I think. It's hard to describe why I found the weirdness enjoyable. I had this to say about it when I watched it for the first (and probably only) time:

From the write-up I was expecting a precursor to Knots's Moments Of Truth. A home invasion film set in a suburban American cul-de-sac.

What I got was a film shot entirely on Lindisfarne by Roman Polanski and starring Dr Loomis from Halloween; Max from Hart To Hart (a villainous role here, but he did say "moider" at one point, making me grin from ear-to-ear); a French Michelle Pfeiffer lookalike; a then-practically-unknown Jacqueline Bissett; and that gobby Scottish piece who gave Kenneth Cope a spanking in Carry On At Your Convenience. All most surreal.
 

Seaviewer

Telly Talk Warrior
LV
9
 
Awards
20
Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)
By this stage in a franchise you pretty much know what to expect and this film is no exception. But it's still fun to watch the 'Busters go through their paces and I think they've done a fair job integrating the new young cast with the obligatory appearances by the oldies - plus a dose of teen angst.
What I'd like to see next is a crossover with the 2016 characters in a mega-mutiversal cataclysm. They've already established the idea of other dimensions, but given the negative reaction to that film, I don't think we'll be seeing them again anytime soon.
 

Monzo

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
1
 
Awards
9
I watched Swan Song and actually only because of Linda Evans. I waited and waited and then finally in the last quarter of an hour of the film she was there. That alone made the film worth watching. Otherwise there were good moments and I would have liked lead actor Udo Kier to have received more recognition for his performance, not necessarily an Oscar nomination because the film wasn't strong enough for that. But his performance was definitely good enough for a Golden Globe nomination.
 

Payton Cross

Telly Talk TV Fanatic
LV
8
 
Awards
18
Beautiful Thing (1996)

iu


Another bit of future Top Ten research that's been on my viewing bucket list for many years.

What did I know about this ahead of time? Well, very little, as it turns out. I knew it was a gay coming-of-age film. I knew it features the music of Mama Cass, of course (I owned the soundtrack on CD many years ago and it was heavily-played. The CD was later cleared out, but most songs remain in iTunes. All the same, I spontaneously re-ordered the CD immediately after watching). And I read (perhaps in the CD leaflet) the intriguing titbit that the film features an "ingenious use of peppermint foot lotion", which sounded rather kinky. And that was where all my knowledge ended.

I had it in my head that this was set in Liverpool. Perhaps I was subliminally aware that writer Jonathan Harvey is from Liverpool. Or perhaps, between Brookside, Priest, Hillsborough, etc., I just have that city on the brain. But nope, it's set in Thamesmead, South East London (on some of the same locations as A Clockwork Orange). The actors whose faces were known to me mostly had EastEnders in common, and it does indeed feel like it has that gritty British soap thing going on (among lots of other things).

From posters and the very premise, it's apparent the two lead characters are young, and I wasn't sure how I'd feel about it watching for the first time as a cynical middle aged viewer. Happily, this film perfectly captured the world of the teenager, from its rules, threats and insecurities to its freedom, magic and fun, and it helped that it was made and set at a time where some of my own experiences aligned with those of the characters (Jamie even has the same Home and Away annual I had, which raised him even further in my estimation). The performances of the two lead actors is unforgettable. Like all the characters in the film, the place and time in which they live informs how they behave. Most characters behave in ways that are hard, unpleasant or anti-social, but just underneath it all there's a fragility and tenderness. I imagine it's not easy to write and perform in a way that's both truthful and accessible, but this story nails it (I'd thought the film was later adapted into a stage show but actually it's the other way round and the stage version came first).

Linda Henry (Enders' hard-faced Shirley. And before that, Mandy Salter's hard-faced mum) is the hard-faced mum here. She's one of several important supporting characters who made me feel I had their number on first sight, but went on to surprise me with their complexities and vulnerability. The other key example of this was her boyfriend Tony who I was convinced was a wrong 'un but turned out to be anything but.

Tameka Empson was a knockout as the Cass-loving neighbour. As I watched, I found myself seeing similarities with early Sixties Barbara Windsor. A special call out goes to Jeillo Edwards, playing Tameka's mother, who kept stealing the show with every little look. There's also Olive from On The Buses who alternates between scowling at her neighbours, caterwauling renditions of Big Spender during karaoke night at the social club where Sandra works and parading on the balcony outside the flat with swimsuit, bling jewellery and cocktails, nibbling cheese and pineapple on sticks. Meera Syal also did wonders with a very small role, with two lines in particular making me laugh out loud. Her cry of "Balls, Mr Bennett!" is the most easily-remembered line from the film.

On this subject, the dialogue is brilliant. I'm sure it's highly quotable, which is a reason to watch again and again. There's a nice selection of them here, but really almost every line is golden and some also very nostalgic. Like Sandra ordering Jamie to get crying Ste a tissue by saying "there's a box of autumnal shades by me bed". And there's lots of prosaic greatness, like the discussion about Sally from Coronation Street also being called Sally in real life, or everyday put-downs that mix pop culture references ("when you can keep up with the questions on Bob's Full House, you get back to me"). But there's also a lot of deeper stuff that reaches the heart. Some of it's like poetry. Some like rap. Frequently it's both. Even the dialogue is lyrical and makes this feel like a borderline musical.

Then there's the soundtrack. You could say this film is to Cass Elliot what Muriel's Wedding is to ABBA. I've long enjoyed the music of Cass and The Mamas & The Papas, but this film has done something incredible by creating new associations and deepening that love. Before watching I'd hoped this might happen, but I didn't count on the degree to which it would do this. There are a few tracks that will now give me chills thinking about the related scene in this film.

What I love about the choice of music is that it's plays against the sometimes bleak realism seen throughout. It's like the voice of hope, but also a joyful expression of youthful energy and optimism. The whole film feels like a mass of contradictory things, which is why the "urban fairytale" tagline fits so well. Characters are rude and foul-mouthed.... and all the more hilarious with it. They're aggressive or even violent, and somehow that creates more sympathy for them because it's clear they want to be more but don't know how. This makes the moments of vulnerability hit harder, especially when it's an unexpectedly sweet line.

And (spoiler) the film lives up to its name. It takes the ordinary and makes it beautiful. It's gorgeously shot and looks like art come to life, from the grey, brutalist landscape surrounding them (which, seen through the prism of this film feels inviting and warm and larger than life) to the twilight dance through the woods which in this romantic haze look very much like the backdrop to a Disney film.

I suppose in the most literal sense the titular beautiful thing is love or connection or truth. Or all the above. That "sweet contentment deep inside" which Cass sings about over the opening titles in It's Getting Better. And it delivers. Dancing happily between stark reality and sweet fantasy, the film lives its message.

With this film, it's difficult to decide if it was everything I would have wanted and more. Or if it was not at all what I might have expected while still speaking to me in a most unexpected way. But I came away from the film feeling both surprised and satisfied. And a whole lot more besides.

Something that almost never happens: I actually found myself rewatching this in full again today, which is the highest form of praise I can lavish on any film.


And an almost-bang-up-to-date review of the film:
Great movie ,i haven't seen this movie in years.
 
Top