What was the last film you watched?

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Sightseers (2012)

1767563280681.png

An intentional choice because the premise seemed like my cup of tea. And it is, I mean it wasn't completely different from what I expected it to be.
It's sort of a mundane blue-collar Natural Born Killers but there's nothing specific about the these Sightseers characters. On the other hand they are so unhinged that it doesn't look random enough.
It has a few funny moments and the mother character is very good but overall the film didn't get much reaction out of me.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Carry On Teacher (1959)

1767584343378.png

Never thought I'd watch my first Carry On on netflix, and I also discovered that they stream lots of British classics including the Studiocanal/Vintage Series of which I have several on DVD.
It goes without saying that these films don't show up in the standard browser mode, you have to look for it.
Now I can't remember why I thought these films would be inaccessibly British, or why that idea would enter my mind to begin with.

The first giggle happened with the introduction of Ms. Allcock., but apart from that and some double entendre here and there it's almost sleaze-free.
I was surprised that it was mostly the slapstick scenes that made me laugh out loud, I guess it really brought out the child in me, helped by a cast of schoolchildren.
Speaking of kids, when you watch a film like this then the hope for them to "be on their best behaviour" is reason enough for them to not fulfil that hope.
In this particular case that bad behaviour will jeopardise the headmaster's transfer to another school, and I didn't quite understand this part.
I paused the film, looked it up on wiki and read that the students actually like Mr. Wakefield, and they don't want him to leave.
Ah, leave it to me to feel confused about the plot of a slapstick movie.
On the other hand, that motive was explained and very emphasised at the end of the story, so maybe I wasn't supposed to know? (there may still be hope for me).
Because of the Billie Turf/Billy Bunter legacy I simply expected every headmaster to be hated.

A blossoming romance is always the easiest fantasy to buy into, and it even works in a Carry On story.
Miss Wheeler, I love you.
Don't question the facts. It's most unscientific.
Oh, I'm sorry.

There's also a happy ending for Ms. Allcock and child psychiatrist Alistair Grigg, with the promise that their children won't avoid physical punishment in case they misbehave. There's something disturbing about that optimistic note, but eventually the discussion is going to end with exasperated parents saying "so now I'm supposed to discuss the misbehaviour with my child??"
I have experienced a few correctional slaps and it was always more than justified.
There was also an evil female teacher who hated me and she used to pull my ear and this actually happened quite often.
She had a ring with a big stone on it and she used that to knock on another boy's head. I remember it vividly and I feared his head was going to crack.
And that's not cool.

Anyway, a few more Carry Ons added to the watchlist although I'm sure there will be a few duds.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Carry On Teacher (1959)

Oh Willie. You have no idea how exciting it was to find this post from you this morning. How thrilling to enjoy your discovery of the films, and I await your thoughts with antici........pation.

As you possibly know James had a terrific Carry On rewatch thread on the old site, and there is a slightly more general one here on Telly Talk which you may (or may not) want to peek at once you're more familiar with the series.



Never thought I'd watch my first Carry On on netflix, and I also discovered that they stream lots of British classics including the Studiocanal/Vintage Series of which I have several on DVD.

Since it's Studiocanal, I'd think you would have access to the first twelve films, which will give a nice flavour of the series. Some you will probably like better than others, but the really terrible ones came towards the end of the series, way past the EMI/Studiocanal era.

There are two main Carry On writers. Norman Hudis wrote the first six (of which Teacher was #3) and you may notice certain similarities between the character arcs in his films. Talbot Rothwell is the other writer (he ended up writing 20 consecutive Carry Ons). His style is generally less-restrained, but if you've enjoyed the slapstick you'll be safe with his films also.


Incidentally, there are several "sub-Carry On" films that were made during the same era from the same team (producers/director/actors/writers) but never had the Carry On title. Some of these are as good assome of the main films, so if you're hungry for more I can give you some pointers.





Now I can't remember why I thought these films would be inaccessibly British, or why that idea would enter my mind to begin with.

Oh, this is an interesting comment. I'd thought the same from time to time, so it's good to read that this one was accessible.




A couple of my thoughts on the Carry On Teacher from last time I watched, back in 2017:

While I knew Richard O'Sullivan was in this one as a child actor, I had convinced myself that Dennis Waterman, too, was in this one. I was rather surprised at my level of disappointment on being reminded this is not the case. The majority of the kids in the film are notable for their lack of precociousness. At least one of the girls, unfortunately, appears to have had elocution lessons, but there's nothing jarringly syrupy or twee about them.

There are some great lines here. Joan Sims is involved in my two personal favourites, both of which seem rather daring for the late '50s.

One of them comes from Joan blowing her whistle which makes no sound. Looking inside she furiously ejaculates "they've taken the pea".

The second exchange is after Joan's tiny gym shorts rip when she bends over (is this the first Carry On wardrobe malfunction?), something she bemoans repeatedly in the staff room. Asked to shut up about her shorts, Joan wails "You haven't seen the hole in them", to which blatantly gay Charles Hawtrey does one of his trademark horrified stage jolts and retorts "I've no wish to".

The latter example in particular seems as filthy as anything the Carry Ons were able to get past the censors over the next decade and a half. At least to my smutty mind.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
A Few Good Men (1992)

iu

Yet another classic I'm only just getting round to watching. I knew a few things about this: Jack Nicholson; Tom Cruise; military court marshal; "I want the truth"/"You can't handle the truth". Oh, and Larry Hagman appeared in some role as a judge or something. Turns out I had all but one correct.

I'm not sure why I didn't watch this years ago. Perhaps it's the length. Perhaps it's the genre. Perhaps it's because Demi Moore is in it. Actually, she's pretty good here, there were a couple of her lines that made me laugh out loud, especially when her character makes a complete knorrs-up of asking her superior if she could be assigned after rehearsing her request so meticulously. Kevin Pollak is very watchable as well, and adds a gravitas and sense of experience to the main triad (Cruise/Moore/Pollak). Seeing them standing together in the courtroom, though, I couldn't help wondering if both Moore and Pollak were selected because they were shorter than Tom Cruise (and I think the gap looked even bigger than it actually is).

Interesting that Tom Cruise got top billing here, over Jack Nicholson (and did I imagine his credit was slightly larger as well?). I found Cruise's character very annoying at times. I think this is partly intentional, and wondered if they were going for a Columbo sort of vibe with his initial introduction as a bumbling kid who appeared to not know much about his own business, therefore setting us up to be surprised by the end. Intentional or otherwise, though, sometimes annoying is just annoying. It's also the one role where I found myself wondering how another actor might play it. Nicholson inhabited his character completely, but Cruise - even though he brings the requisite arrogance - felt more reliant on busy body language, gesticulating, raising his voice or distractions such as noisy eating and apple or throwing a baseball bat round to hold the attention. It's a perfectly serviceable performance, but there's nothing in it that feels great, and it's animated almost to the point of caricature (some might even say ham). It's also difficult to imagine the character being able to truly hold his own against Nicholson's, which at least helps sell the story, even if I had to suspend disbelief when it came to the outcome. In my mind, Nicholson's character would have been far too disciplined to have been goaded into confessing, even if it helped that I fully believed Cruise's character rubs people up the wrong way and used that to his advantage here. In the end, what we got was so satisfying that I accepted it.

The rest of the cast is a who's who of small and large screen actors of the era: there's Kevin Bacon; Kiefer Sutherland; Cuba Gooding Jr.; the good-looking one from Twin Peaks, the good-looking one from ER...

This was the recently-departed Rob Reiner's follow-up to Misery, which followed up When Harry Met Sally. What a time this would have been for him, with hit after hit. It's produced by none other than David Brown which immediately elevated it in my mind, and it met expectations. Aaron Sorkin's screenwriting must also get credit for giving such a solid and compelling film.

The two hours and twenty minutes went by very quickly (mercifully, there were no ad breaks on Prime, which is always a bit of a lottery, so that helped as well).
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
I've read A Few Good Men review not so long ago, I haven't seen the film myself but I remember the comments saying that it was very hammy and that the reveal came because of an inexplicably uncharacteristic, emotional outburst rather than being cleverly checkmated - which I interpret as a deus ex machina.
Do you recognise any of that or was the review exaggerated?

but the really terrible ones came towards the end of the series
I imagine these are the more overtly sleazy ones, and while that doesn't offend me at all I do think it takes the "double" out of the double entendre, and then the joke doesn't land anymore.
Incidentally, there are several "sub-Carry On" films that were made during the same era from the same team
Yes, several related titles came up in the Carry On search and I've randomly added She'll Have To Go and On The Buses to the list.
With all my series on DVD to watch plus the 60+ titles I found on netflix I think I might be overstretching myself, therefore I have no idea when the next Carry On will be shown in Cinema Mercantile.
My plans for 2025 have been ruthlessly sabotaged by many detours and distractions. I got lots of great stuff instead and I like to think that it was necessary for my "personal growth" as Oprah would say it, but the fact remains that it happened at the expense of other and earlier ambitions.

One more thing (how Columbo of me) I'd like to mention about CARRY ON TEACHER is that the school play disaster is surprisingly similar to CARRIE's iconic prom scene. Minus the kill count, of course.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I remember the comments saying that it was very hammy and that the reveal came because of an inexplicably uncharacteristic, emotional outburst rather than being cleverly checkmated - which I interpret as a deus ex machina.
Do you recognise any of that or was the review exaggerated?

The review was pretty accurate about the flaws that required suspension of disbelief. I thought Tom Cruise provided most of the ham, but overall performances were good.


I imagine these are the more overtly sleazy ones, and while that doesn't offend me at all I do think it takes the "double" out of the double entendre, and then the joke doesn't land anymore.

You've nailed it, really. The innuendo and double ententre just weren't as funny once things were more up-front (so to speak). But also the writing went downhill terribly, and there are only so many puns one can recycle. And it also had the Dallas problem of the ageing cast beginning to drop out, with those left not able to achieve the same magic.




Yes, several related titles came up in the Carry On search and I've randomly added She'll Have To Go and On The Buses to the list.

Oh, On The Buses was quite fun. Hammer Studios made many big screen versions of sitcoms around that time, and many of them were pretty good. I enjoyed watching the OTB films for the first time a couple of years ago.

I'd thought I watched She'll Have To Go for the first time last year, but it turned out it was 2020. Scary how quickly the time has gone. Here's what I said about it after that only watch:
It was a little abundant in the SFX department to the point of being cartoony at times. All the same, I found it very enjoyable. Shades of Kind Hearts and Coronets and Blithe Spirit with a dash of early Carry On. And, inexplicably, a character bursting into a serious romantic song at a random moment.

A couple of recommendations (as if you don't have enough to watch) from the Carry On team:

  • Please Turn Over (probably coincidentally, this basically uses the "local girl writes book about her family and neighbours" plot of Return To Peyton Place)
  • Nurse On Wheels
  • Raising The Wind




I think I might be overstretching myself, therefore I have no idea when the next Carry On will be shown in Cinema Mercantile.

Well, I'll conceal my disappointment and stiffen my upper lip as I wait patiently and hopefully for your second entry in the series.




My plans for 2025 have been ruthlessly sabotaged by many detours and distractions. I got lots of great stuff instead and I like to think that it was necessary for my "personal growth" as Oprah would say it, but the fact remains that it happened at the expense of other and earlier ambitions.

Sometimes things just unfold organically despite all plans. I hope you get to tick a few of those boxes in 2026.




One more thing (how Columbo of me) I'd like to mention about CARRY ON TEACHER is that the school play disaster is surprisingly similar to CARRIE's iconic prom scene. Minus the kill count, of course.

Oh yes. You're not wrong.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
Prometheus (2012)

1767663756119.png

I like the world-building of the Engineers, with all its over-the-top CGI set pieces. If android David had been the main protagonist then it could have been a new 2001 Space Odyssey, or a cheesier version thereof.
But no, it also has to be that Alien film so how do we get this creature on board? Stupid characters.
They are on a multi-billion dollar mission to the Ultimate Answer in Space, they have the most advanced technology at their disposal and they can scan everything. Everything, there's no limit.
So what do they do? Take off the safety helmets and touch everything with their hands. For crying out loud.
After that it all becomes predictable routine, and there are several dangerous scenes with lots of physical activity that are impossible to watch because it's all fast-moving CGI images.
Bodies flying through the air, but who is who? You can't tell, and that's why the spectacle becomes the most boring part of the film.

There's no logic in David bringing the alien species into the ship. The man he answers to wants to meet the Engineer who can make him immortal. That's being 90 years old for all eternity.
I only kept watching to see if it could get any worse, and I was not disappointed.
For example, to ramp up the tension, someone has to outsmart a sexist self-operation bed. It's almost awesomely bad.
It even becomes Alien Vs. Engineer. Almost everything is exactly on that Freddy Vs. Jason level.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Scooby-Doo (2002)

iu

I wasn't expecting art, and I appreciate I'm quite some decades too old to be the core demographic, but I still hoped for a bit of fun with some affectionate nods towards the classic animated series. Mostly, I hoped for a bit of atmosphere.

What I watched was a film that was frustratingly noisy and busy, with a loud rock soundtrack, terribly dated CGI and a "plot" that made me weary almost as soon as I began watching. The visuals were overly vibrant, with no moody backdrops or spooky atmosphere at all.

The cosplay element of the main characters (apart from the computer animated titular one) was probably the most watchable part. They were instantly recognisable and wore something approximating their classic outfits, though Velma's jumper was redder than her classic pumpkin one, while Daphne leaned a bit too hard into fuchsia instead than Cadbury purple. Shaggy was perfectly cast. Finally there's a place where Matthew Lillard's brand of acting feels appropriate. (Also, I kind of crave his corduroy trousers). The soon-to-be-Prinzes are incredibly photogenic. Freddie is one of the few people on earth who could pull off that shock of blonde hair and still look gorgeous. The auburn hair really suits Sarah Michelle Gellar and I'd say this is the most stunning I've seen her look (albeit I only really know her from I Know What You Did Last Summer, Scream 2 and one or two scenes of Buffy). The auburn hair suits her.

Still though, a terrible film that made me instantly remove the sequel from my watch list. I hope Rowan Atkinson was paid well to get anywhere near this.






I like the world-building of the Engineers

From my viewing I was on the same page here:

what was most impressive about this Alien-adjacent project was the degree of world-building taking place. New concepts, ideas and innovations are to be found left, right and centre, and the balance between the familiar and the new was spot-on.






After that it all becomes predictable routine, and there are several dangerous scenes with lots of physical activity that are impossible to watch because it's all fast-moving CGI images.

And here I had a different experience:


There's obviously more CGI than in 1979's Alien, but it seems to be used relatively sparingly and stops short of unnatural artifice. It's most noticeable during scenes featuring holograms and suchlike, when one would expect it to look artificial. For the rest of the film there seem to be plenty of practical sets and effects.

(I couldn't back up my comments at this point since the film has long since vanished from memory).



someone has to outsmart a sexist self-operation bed

Ha. Yes, that scene did irritate me.




By the way, after watching Prometheus I ended up watching the bonus features and especially liked this fake TED Talk which was part of its viral marketing campaign. It may be of interest:

 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
That's being 90 years old for all eternity.

I don't recall a single thing about PROMETHEUS -- which tells me what I thought of the film -- other than waiting for the payoff of why Guy Pierce was playing a 90-year old in heavy makeup. As I recall, there was no such payoff, leaving it inexplicable.

a terrible film that made me instantly remove the sequel from my watch list.
I have no fondness for either films, but the sequel trots out of a lot of the villains from the original cartoons, which is a bit of fun. You can get the gist of that, though, from a few clips on Youtube.

I also have a smidge of resentment towards these movies. Gen X pop culture repackaged for Millennials, who then have more nostalgia for the cruddy remakes than the originals. See also: Jim Carrey's Grinch.
 

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
The Mastermind (2025)

MV5BYmEzYzMwZDUtMjdiYi00YmRlLWJiNjYtYzY2N2E3ZWZjOTcxXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


The Mastermind (2025) is a subversion of the heist genre in that is doesn't have exciting action sequences but is more of a deeply layered character study of the main character who plans a robbery, played by Josh O'Connor (who seems to be everywhere these days). Set in 1970s Massachusetts, the film follows JB Moony (Josh O’Connor), an unemployed carpenter, who masterminds a plan to steal four valuable paintings from a local art gallery. The film focuses on the unglamorous side of the heist and attention is on the mundane planning, the fumbled execution and the messy aftermath as JB tries to get out of the failures of his botched robbery. The film looks like it had a relatively small budget but that doesn't stop it from being quite gripping and beautifully paced.
 

Angela Channing

Telly Talk Veteran
LV
19
 
Awards
52
Eternity (2025)

MV5BNzlmZTNiOTAtNzhlOC00ZTA1LWJhNTgtMDQ4YmY4NWIyNTA4XkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_.jpg


This is a romantic drama with some elements of humour rather than being a romcom. It has the interesting premise of what choice an individual would make in the after life. The story follows Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) as she arrives at a transit hub for dead people where they must choose a time from their past that they are to inhabit for all of eternity. Joan faces a emotional dilemma of having to choose between the husband she spent sixty years with (Miles Teller) and her first love (Callum Turner), who died decades earlier and has been waiting for her. The film asks whether a "perfect" moment in Joan's past is more valuable than the messy reality of her life fully lived. This isn't Shakespeare but its an entertaining film that makes you think about what you would do in similar circumstances.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I wonder if Prometheus was meant to be a completely different sci-fi story, and that the studio was only willing to fund it if he would cram it into the Alien franchise.

That would be very easy to believe but I don't believe it would be the case. After Alien vs. Predator peed all over the franchise Ridley Scott opted out of the sequel he was planning and I believe deliberately chose to make a prequel but with only a tenuous connection to the Xenomorph (since it was retrospectively applied to the creature only in the sequels, the "X" word chokes me in the same kind of way you choke on "franchise"). The studio's line in the sand was that Ridley himself had to direct it, and they refused to make it with a director he'd handpicked.

I believe the follow-up film, Covenant, suffered more from studio interference since Scott wanted to continue exploring the "AI as the Big Bad" theme, while the studio insisted on taking things into more familiar Alien territory.



I have no fondness for either films, but the sequel trots out of a lot of the villains from the original cartoons, which is a bit of fun.

Oh, that's interesting. Was there actually a rogues gallery of villains that were known? I only watched casually, but my memory is of every reveal being some variation on the creepy groundskeeper or whatever (something the 2002 film poked fun at in its opening scene).



I also have a smidge of resentment towards these movies. Gen X pop culture repackaged for Millennials, who then have more nostalgia for the cruddy remakes than the originals.

I hear you on that one.




The story follows Joan (Elizabeth Olsen) as she arrives at a transit hub for dead people where they must choose a time from their past that they are to inhabit for all of eternity. Joan faces a emotional dilemma of having to choose between the husband she spent sixty years with (Miles Teller) and her first love (Callum Turner), who died decades earlier and has been waiting for her. The film asks whether a "perfect" moment in Joan's past is more valuable than the messy reality of her life fully lived.

This is one of those examples where the concept itself is so very fascinating I find myself wondering if the film could live up to it.
 

Crimson

Telly Talk Enthusiast
LV
2
 
Awards
9
Was there actually a rogues gallery of villains that were known?

Not a rogues gallery, which would imply some reoccurrence. And yes, the culprit was always Farmer Johnson wearing a mask rather than an actual ghost. At least in the original batch. Later versions of Scooby Do had the gang going up against actual monsters.

I haven't seen a Scooby Doo cartoon in decades, but some of these one-time appearance fraud-villains are seared into my memory. I don't recall how the second live action movie handled them, but quite a few of them were in the movie.

1767725064266.jpeg
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
I haven't seen a Scooby Doo cartoon in decades, but some of these one-time appearance fraud-villains are seared into my memory.

Now there's a visual, some of these look quite familiar to me.




It's a high concept film but it's not executed in a deep and profound way, and it's probably all the better for it.

It's often better to keep these things simple. Even from just reading the concept I've already found myself beginning to wonder which time from my past I would choose.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
The Contract (2006)

iu

When flicking through Prime, this was added to my watchlist as soon as I saw the two lead actors. I was a little surprised I hadn't heard of it, but then took a quick glance to see who else was it in it and happened to read that it had a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes (which I assume is bad). I don't put much stock in this, since so many of these reviews are driven by insecurity or a need to fit in with what's written by peers. And there's no accounting for taste anyway. Still, having also seen something about production issues I went in with expectations well and truly in check.

To me this felt at times like a TV movie (and it did go straight to home media, so I suppose it technically is). The production values at times suggest a lower budget than one would expect to attract Hollywood heavyweights. It does have some ambitious set pieces and stunts that mostly work, but not always 100%. There's a helicopter crash that sums up the conflict of the big moments. The exteriors show the copter falling apart and rotors flying off and it feels subjective and terrifying. Then we cut to inside, and it feels like the budget had run out so they just asked the cameraman to shake the camera as though they're making an episode of The Young Doctors or something. It's not just the big moments, though. Some of the character scenes - particularly early on in the film - feel a little flat (this was where I go the TV movie feel from), with exposition a tad clunkier than I would expect.

All this aside, I don't understand the evident hate for it, other than people are more offended by something average than they are something terrible.

When it gets going and the premise is established, it works. This is particularly true after Cusack meets Freeman's character and has the horrible dilemma where he has to weigh up the evils and decide how to react. It's a horrible situation to be in, and provoked a degree of anxiety in me. In this regard it's quite Hitchcockian, since Cusack is our everyman and a character to whom the audience can easily relate. As he tries to work out what's real and who can be trusted it becomes compelling. It turns out this is also true for Freeman's character since not all his friends are friends. In terms of story there are also similarities at times to the big screen version of The Fugitive.

To my eyes it's not a bad film. Actually, it's good. It's just not Freeman/Cusack great.
 

Willie Oleson

Telly Talk Schemer
LV
9
 
Awards
27
The Stunt Man (1980)

1767798289101.png

A film about making a film directed by a larger than life character played by Peter O'Toole.
The recurring trick is that everyone on set except for the stunt man protagonist is playing by the script. What looks like a stunt going terribly wrong turns out be the scene they intended to film.
The stunt man (Steve Railsback) is actually a distressed and down on his luck Vietnam returnee who accidentally ends up in the production of a WWI movie, and the bizarreness could be interpreted as his personal distorted experience. On the other hand, we don't know if the ambitious director can be trusted.

The camera techniques are mind-bogglingly masterful, many close-up scenes are framed in 5 or more different ways so that it almost looks like 3-D. Feeling sucked into the scenery I unintentionally tried to wave away a thick smoke or fog that appeared on screen.
Romantic sub-plots have the reputation of "interfering" with the meatiest parts, but Barbara Hershey does it with a lot of vigor and joy, thus making herself essential to the story.

I found it a terrific experience, and even though the film has a good reputation it's relatively obscure in the context of "best films of the 1980s".
Maybe it had something to do with lack of proper marketing, and in fact - just like The Long Good Friday - it's a film from 1979 that was delayed for release.
The second disc features the nearly two hours (!) The Sinister Saga Of Making 'The Stunt Man' documentary but I'll save it for later.
 

Mel O'Drama

Admin
LV
16
 
Awards
44
Good Will Hunting (1997)

iu

As always, I feel I need to make my excuses for waiting the best part of three decades before finally watching this film. Thing is, though,I don't know what my excuse is. It may have to do with a mild aversion to Robin Williams, but I couldn't swear to it. Regardless, it has been on my radar since it came out.

My image of the film was of something sentimental, warm and whimsical. Only the first two are arguably present, and in smaller quantities than I'd envisaged. I was pleasantly surprised by the grittiness to the film, particularly when it came to Will and his gang. Their bravado, predilection for sometimes violent confrontations and their earthy language reminded me of Saturday Night Fever (another film where there's more to it than the poster image).

Will's edge in particular was surprising because one looks at the poster image and sees a wholesome-looking all-American boy, so I'd kind of decided the film was about this nice boy forming a friendship with a teacher who is somewhat remote. Instead, Will is the one with the challenging behaviour, and I really like the idea of one damaged person trying to reach another.

Another surprise was the soundtrack of vintage, folksy songs, sometimes at odds with the imagery on screen (as in the scene where Will and his friends get into a bloody fight in the basketball court). They - along with touches such as the ancient car presented to Will - serve as a reminder that this film is not really of its time and place. Instead there's something timeless about it.

Even though I never actually saw it, this film was my first awareness of either Matt Damon or Ben Affleck. Such was the buzz about it. In many ways, they still feel like these hot new kids on the scene, but what an exciting time this would have been, when they actually were these two relative newbies enjoying double duty as leading men and screenwriters. And what a script this is. Peppered in among the naturalistic prose come a series of winning, lengthy monologues as they use language to break someone down or to build them up. Their Academy Award win was thoroughly deserved.

I feel differently about Robin Williams's win, though. Not because it isn't a great performance - it is - but because, despite the film crediting actors in order of appearance, Williams really got top billing as seen on the poster. To nominate him for Best Supporting Actor is a diabolical cheat. He should have been up against Jack Nicholson, Dustin Hoffman and, yes, even Matt Damon. Williams probably wouldn't have won, but at least it would have been a noble loss rather than a sneaky win.

On the subject of supporting actors, there are so many good turns here, and the chemistry between any combination of actors is off the charts. There's a brilliant scene in a joke shop where Matt Damon and Minnie Driver say their lines while trying on a series of different funny noses and boggle eyes and whatnot, while trying not to corpse. It's very endearing, and feels as though they're simply improvising. Many of Minnie's scenes feel this way. Crucially, it's with her character that Will comes to life and feels complete.

The ending pulls off the combination of satisfying and bittersweet, which works for me.
 
Top