- Awards
- 21
Dave Rubin is usually an idiot, but he's not wrong about this...
No Dr. Seuss books have been banned. His estate (HIS FAMILY) decided to have several of his books taken out of print. That is their right, as those books are their property.So True. The actors of a previous era served their country with honor in WW2, and didn't participate in divisive woke political activities
that divide people while vilifying those people who do not support the extreme leftist agendas that these overrated, overpaid, ignorant,
usually poorly educated entertainers try to forcefeed to the populace. It is always interesting to me how people who claim to support
free speech are intolerant to the point of name calling, ostracizing, belittling and cancelling those who don't agree with them
How many people have been publicly harangued on the news media and social media for remarks that are decades old?
Conservative speakers are silenced on college campuses . Books by beloved icons like Dr Seuss have been banned!
Diversity is a desirable goal, but not when a checklist is required for projects that need the best available talent,
resulting in watered down, mediocre outcomes.
The free exchange of ideas is the basis of a healthy society, and the Founding Fathers wisely prioritized it,
They would be horrified at the selective censorship that is now too commonplace
I find it telling that a discussion about the ill-advised behavior of one actor has turned into a complaint thread about "woke" Hollywood.What has this got to do with the Oscars? No one commented on banning of books. There were no extreme leftist agendas on display. Most of the politics was about Ukraine. People who wear blue and white badges and ribbons criticising other for virtue signalling is the height of hypocrisy.
Actors from Hollywood's golden age were as political, if not more so, than actors today. One of them became President for goodness sake, how can you be less political than that? James Stewart made war propaganda films and Bette Davis started the Hollywood Canteen and many of the major stars of the era worked there to support the war effort including Humphrey Bogart, Ingrid Bergman, Donna Reed, Jane Wyman and Gregory Peck. Elizabeth Taylor was an HIV and AIDS activist and Charlton Heston was a high profile supporter of gun rights.
I find it telling that a discussion about the ill-advised behavior of one actor has turned into a complaint thread about "woke" Hollywood.
There wasn't much political content at all last night (the Ukraine mentions aside), yet people (who obviously didn't watch the show) are complaining about how "leftist" it was.
Will Smith shouldn't have hit Chris Rock. Having said that, I think everyone is making more of it that Rock himself is. If he isn't outraged enough to press charges, seems to me others shouldn't be so outraged on his behalf.
As someone else said, the worst part about this is that no one is talking about all the deserving and talented winners - including Smith himself.

I find it telling that a discussion about the ill-advised behavior of one actor has turned into a complaint thread about "woke" Hollywood.
There wasn't much political content at all last night (the Ukraine mentions aside), yet people (who obviously didn't watch the show) are complaining about how "leftist" it was.
Will Smith shouldn't have hit Chris Rock. Having said that, I think everyone is making more of it that Rock himself is. If he isn't outraged enough to press charges, seems to me others shouldn't be so outraged on his behalf.
As someone else said, the worst part about this is that no one is talking about all the deserving and talented winners - including Smith himself.
Excluding Ukraine, significantly less than 1% of the show was political. The idea that it was wall to wall left wing commentary is laughable. The trouble is some people are so right wing they consider anything that doesn't agree with their extremist opinions to be left wing, i.e. the overwhelming majority of viewpoints and contributions.
to be honest (...) i didn't hear the joke so i dunno what he said nor i have i gone looking for it either.
No Dr. Seuss books have been banned. His estate (HIS FAMILY) decided to have several of his books taken out of print. That is their right, as those books are their property.
Books ARE being banned all over the country right now. In my own county it is constant. But I guess I can't talk about that here. Sure wouldn't want to be accused of being a "woke leftist."
www.independentsentinel.com
Was Dr Seuss even mentioned at the Oscars? No, not even once. Was banning books even mentioned at the Oscars? No, not even once. This is completely off topic and totally irrelevant.![]()
Oh The Places The Woke Will Go: Dr. Seuss Canceled For ‘Racial Undertones’
A national educators organization is telling schools to avoid reading Dr. Seuss because the children’s books allegedly have “racial undertones.” For more than 20 years, March 2 has been recognized as Read Across America Day in honor of Dr. Seuss’s birthday. The reading recognition day was...www.dailywire.com
![]()
Chicago Public Library removing 6 Dr. Seuss books from the shelves while it determines long-term options
The six books are: “And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street,” “If I Ran the Zoo,” “McElligot’s Pool,” “On Beyond Zebra!” “Scrambled Eggs Super!” and “The Cat’s Quizzer.”www.chicagotribune.com
![]()
Loudon County Virginia schools cancels Dr. Seuss
The popular children’s author is too controversial for one of Virginia’s largest school districts. The Read Across America Day is canceled. The officials say they can’t ignore the research [which is very minimal and suspect]. Augusta Precious Metals: Best Gold IRA Company? See the Proof. Use...www.independentsentinel.com
![]()
'Cat in the Hat is racist?': Dr. Seuss is being canceled for 'anti blackness and white supremacy'
Learning for Justice has convinced a Virginia school district to cancel Dr. Seuss because of his alleged "anti-blackness and white supremacy"www.bizpacreview.com
![]()
Biden removes mention of Dr. Seuss from Read Across America Day
President Biden removed mentions of Dr. Seuss from Read Across America Day amid accusations of “racial undertones” in the classic, whimsical tales for children. Read Across America Day,…nypost.com
The above links will detail the despicable decision to cancel Dr Seuss, and how Dr Seuss was removed from Read Across America Day,
and how books were removed from the shelves.
Yes the family decided to cease publication of six books, but it was pressured by various entities,
who are intolerant of any view except their own
These advocates think they may have succeeded in censoring a beloved author, but
as usual with banned/censored books, people have decided to exercise their freedom
by purchasing their books (See Links below)
The assertion that there are racial stereotypes may have validity, but any number of published works
including the Bible, The Torah, the Koran, Shakespeare have been similarly criticized,
Should they also be removed, thus erasing records of human thought and culture over
centuries?
Learning for Justice, a woke leftist organization demanded such an action
Louden County School District acted accordingly and removed the books (so much for free thought in the classroom)
A Study from St. Catherine's University was used to buttress the demand to cancel Dr. Seuss (Anyone can produce a study to justify anything)
The Chicago Library discontinued the books ( I thought that Libraries abhorred censorship)
I am a moderate, not a far right conservative.
I oppose censorship in any form.
I prefer reasoned debate and dialogue, not appeasement to demands by woke extremists
This is de facto censorship and it is disgraceful
Basically, a handful of activists decided to pressure the family to adhere
to their agenda, and it is despicable
Again, however, people have responded by buying these books (See links below)
![]()
Stampede for Dr. Seuss titles sends book sales up 34%
The book industry saw sales surge 34 percent last week — thanks in part to the stampede for Dr. Seuss titles following moves to end the publication of six books over racially offensive images…nypost.com
![]()
'Banned' Dr. Seuss Book Prices Explode on the Secondary Market
The controversy over Dr. Seuss Enterprises pulling six Seuss books for offensive imagery has caused the books to soar in price on the secondary marketwww.cbr.com
Be honest, this isn't about freedom of speech, it's about stifling opinions that are not extreme right wing ones.
One disturbing trend is how divided are the genders (assuming there may only be two of them) in their take on the infamous Oscar slap. Men seem to see Will (and Jada) as the bad guy, while women see Will as the good guy (or even the hero).
Which men are saying this nonsense? White ones who know little about black culture?A lot of men are arguing that because the black community in America is a matriarchy, that all the women -- especially black women -- who are supporting Smith hitting Rock are doing so to defend a domineering woman's right to control her beta cuck husband.
Surely you can see the hypocrisy of wanting to ban books that have gay themes while claiming books that have racist elements should be allowed on the grounds of free speech?I'm all too aware of the conservative scam and I know what they're all about (by that, I mean mostly the politicians) but they're pretty much the ones who are saying the correct things about the abuses of woke-ist extremism -- largely because it's easy to get that right (or correct). Sure, the right-wingers are cynically using it to their advantage for disingenuous political reasons, but the pseudo-left is helping them with their own aggravated goofiness
Which men are saying this nonsense? White ones who know little about black culture?
Surely you can see the hypocrisy of wanting to ban books that have gay themes while claiming books that have racist elements should be allowed on the grounds of free speech?
Was Dr Seuss even mentioned at the Oscars? No, not even once. Was banning books even mentioned at the Oscars? No, not even once. This is completely off topic and totally irrelevant.
Personally I think it's hypocritical for people to whinge about books with racist undertones being banned when at the same time they are advocating banning books that are related to matters of racial diversity and LGBTQ+ issues.
Be honest, this isn't about freedom of speech, it's about stifling opinions that are not extreme right wing ones.
Which black men are saying "all the women -- especially black women -- who are supporting Smith hitting Rock are doing so to defend a domineering woman's right to control her beta cuck husband" because I don't believe it?Actually, more black men than white... And are you suggesting "black culture" in the States is the same everywhere? Not all black men are blind to, or defend, the matriarchy dynamic in the black community in America.
A lot of people see Jada as a predatory woman and one who shares far too much, even to degrading Will, about their personal lives on her red table show -- and yet he smacks Rock over a dumb joke?
Love may make you do "crazy things" but so can co-dependence.
Not that that's my particular view necessarily.
Which black men are saying "all the women -- especially black women -- who are supporting Smith hitting Rock are doing so to defend a domineering woman's right to control her beta cuck husband" because I don't believe it?